IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 97% Would buy again 65 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 95% Delivers good value for the price 60 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | 96% Happy with the feature set 64 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 54 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 98% Implementation went as expected 56 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.9 |
| Usability | - | 7.7 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Microsoft Defender for Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots |














