IBM Security QRadar SOAR vs. Trellix Automated Response
IBM Security QRadar SOAR vs. Trellix Automated Response
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar SOAR | N/A | IBM Security® QRadar® SOAR is designed to help your security team respond to cyberthreats with confidence, automate with intelligence and collaborate with consistency. It guides your team in resolving incidents by codifying established incident response processes into dynamic playbooks. | N/A | |
Trellix Automated Response | N/A | Security orchestration and automation helps users improve response times, reduce risk exposure and maintain process consistency across a security program. Being able to simplify security operations means being able to prioritize alerts, improve staff efficiencies and decrease response times. Trellix Automated Response is a solution designed to provide this. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Trellix Automated Response | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Usage-based pricing: This simple, scalable option allows starting small with an initial users and capabilities and scaling up as more users are added, as well as capabilities and data. Enterprise-wide pricing: This option is based on either the size of the enterprise-wide IT infrastructure or the size and type of data sources being secured. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Trellix Automated Response |
|---|
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Trellix Automated Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Splunk SOAR Score 8.3 out of 10 | Splunk SOAR Score 8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Score 1.6 out of 10 | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Score 1.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Trellix Automated Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 5.5 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 6.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Trellix Automated Response | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Pros | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Cons | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Usability | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Performance | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Scalability | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | IBM
| ![]() FireEye No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar SOAR Screenshots |





