IBM Security QRadar SOAR vs. Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security® QRadar® SOAR is designed to help your security team respond to cyberthreats with confidence, automate with intelligence and collaborate with consistency. It guides your team in resolving incidents by codifying established incident response processes into dynamic playbooks. | N/A |
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | Score7.4 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Vulcan Cyber was an exposure and vulnerability risk mitigation platform, acquired by Tenable in early 2025. The product is no longer available for sale, and functionality has been integrated into the Tenable One Exposure Management platform's vulnerability solution. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Usage-based pricing: This simple, scalable option allows starting small with an initial users and capabilities and scaling up as more users are added, as well as capabilities and data. Enterprise-wide pricing: This option is based on either the size of the enterprise-wide IT infrastructure or the size and type of data sources being secured. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
88% Would buy again 15 Answers | 100% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
93% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 9 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | 83% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Splunk SOAR Score9.1 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Score1.1 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | 5.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 7.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.3 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.2 | - |
| IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Vulcan Cyber (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar SOAR Screenshots |





