TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Informatica Data Archive (legacy) vs. ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AInformatica Data Archive is used to control data growth in production databases and retire legacy applications. It is a legacy product and will not receive further updates.N/A

    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/ARisk Quantifier (RQ) translates cyber risk into clear financial terms, allowing security leaders to prioritize defenses and communicate impact in the language of business. By mapping MITRE ATT&CK techniques and vulnerabilities to financial loss scenarios, RQ enables cost-justified security decisions. Together with TI Ops and Polarity, RQ ensures that operational efforts align to risk-based priorities — bridging the gap between threat activity and executive decision-making.N/A
    Pricing
    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Small Businesses
    Amazon S3 Glacier
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Google Vault
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving
    Score8.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Informatica Data Archive (legacy)ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    To manage users, go to the admin dashboard, here is a section for users. In this users section here you can see which users are configured and you have the ability to suspend a user. If you want to edit or add users, you need to go to the Organization section, then click on another user section there, which then gives you the ability to edit or add users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    Well-Suited Scenarios: Reporting to management where financial risk metrics are required. - Vulnerability prioritization when you need to rank issues by real exploit risk and financial/business impact. Less-Appropriate Scenarios: Fast-changing cloud environments where asset data needs updates too frequently for accurate models required all the time. - Incident investigation, as ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) is not designed for real-time check
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Works well with curated data
    • Allows you to monitor data movements within an organisation
    • Advisable to use ILM if already using Informatica PowerCenter
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Provides scenario-based modeling to measure risk, which can be reduced through patches or new controls.
    • Delivers technical-to-business reporting that supports remediation planning and financial budget planning.
    • Ranks vulnerabilities by exploit risk and business impact
    • Quantifies cyber risk in financial terms using vulnerability, threat, and asset data.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • As we are still piloting the product at our company at this time the feedback is highly limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Dashboards can be customized to offer more options, especially for technical teams that require deeper drill-downs and also more simpler and user-friendly.
    • Processing large data files can be slow sometimes, especially during large builds or bulk updates.
    • Risk modules sometimes need manual intervention for multi-client environments, which can be time-consuming.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    ThreatConnect
    I rate ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) an 8 because it’s generally easy to use once the integrations are set up. The dashboards, risk scores, and financial impact metrics are very straightforward and help make quick decisions for executives. However, the initial configuration and model tuning can be a bit complex it's not a perfect 10 for me.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    [The] customer support is quite good. Cost also has another point to add, along with process integration and ease of using new tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) stacked up better than RiskLens, better for our organization, is mainly because it integrates directly with our scanners, SIEM, and CMDB, allowing automatic, real-time risk monitoring. It also combines exploit intel, asset value, and vulnerability data more efficiently, giving us clearer technical priorities for the business impact. We chose ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) because it provides faster, more actionable risk scoring with less manual modeling than RiskLens.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • it is also fully integrated with all other AWS services
    • manages the entire life cycle of the Certificates by itself, so it will reduce your work by a really big amount
    • it can also be easily integrated with ELB and front-end cloud services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Improved alignment between IT, security, and business teams because risk is measured in financial terms, not just technical terms.
    • It gives leadership clear cost-based risk metrics, making it easier to justify security budgets and prioritize projects.
    • Initial setup and data integration require time and more disruption to the existing setup
    • Risk models sometimes need tuning, adding extra operational overhead.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots