Inoxoft vs. test IO

I recommend Inoxoft as a young but potentially top software development provider. If you are in need of innovative solutions, just provide the team with as much information as possible and you won’t even need to be involved in the process. The engineers are hard-working and enthusiastic. They are interested in the best outcome of the project.

I think it's definitely more of an e2e testing tool versus just testing individual components.

Incentivized

• Plan project details.
• Provides us with a few technology options.
• Web application development.
• Web application design.

• catch bugs
• test e2e flows
• accurately report bugs with screenshots and videos

Incentivized

• Nothing specific comes to mind. Overall we are very satisfied.

• honestly, nothing comes to mind - I think it's a great tool

Incentivized

All the details of our communication were discussed during the initial stages, before getting into the development. Inoxoft has an excellent project management performance in terms of cost, quality, and time. As I mentioned before, I’m satisfied with weekly updates where the project manager informs us about the news, changes, and issues (if any occur).

We did most of our research through Clutch and Inoxoft seemed to be a great fit for the partnership we needed.

test IO is MUCH easier to set up test cases and because it uses actual humans, it's a better real life tool. Rainforest was too picky on the test cases and you had to be overly specific.

Incentivized

• Inoxoft’s team has met all requirements so far.
• It is too early to mention the deliverables, but it has been excellent work and cooperation with Inoxoft’s team.
• The project is ongoing.

• Catching bugs before customers do
• Catching bugs during a release

Incentivized