TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

InterSystems Caché (legacy product) vs. Oracle TimesTen

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    InterSystems Caché (legacy product)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AInterSystems Caché® was a multi-modal operational database for transaction processing applications, that provided several APIs to operate with same data simultaneously: key-value, relational, object, document, and multidimensional.N/A

    Oracle TimesTen

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AOracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (TimesTen) delivers real time application performance by changing the assumptions around where data resides at runtime. By managing data in memory, and optimizing data structures and access algorithms, database operations execute achieve gains in responsiveness and throughput. With TimesTen Scaleout, a shared nothing scale-out architecture based on the existing in-memory technology, TimesTen allows databases to scale across hosts, reach hundreds of terabytes in…N/A
    Pricing
    InterSystems Caché (legacy product)Oracle TimesTen
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    InterSystems Caché (legacy product)Oracle TimesTen
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    InterSystems Caché (legacy product)Oracle TimesTen
    Likelihood to Recommend
    4.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    InterSystems Caché (legacy product)Oracle TimesTen
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    It's definitely great for medical industries that need the vast amounts of features/security/performance, however if you need something simple then this would be too much. There is a learning curve, and if you come from more common database technologies, then there will be a lot of differences to handle. Simple database needs would be better fulfilled elsewhere, but Cache is for when you need to take the next step, whether that be in the volume, complexity, or security of ETL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    TimesTen is well suited for applications using smaller data or smaller data stores and where transaction response times are not as business critical. TimesTen is good for applications already accessing Oracle and need to cache data for quick read/write operations. TimesTen is not appropriate for large data dependent applications or applications requiring fast response times. In these cases, using Oracle database or Exadata is better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Performance
    • Robustness
    • Reliable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • With basic database experience, TimesTen has a very short learning curve.
    • The installation and setup is easy and straightforward. The command line instructions are easy to follow.
    • The error logging mechanism is simple and efficient. The system log files are helpful in troubleshooting problems with using TimesTen.
    • The maintenance tools are user friendly and effective. Upgrading is easy and quick. TimesTen is almost a self-administrating database.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • The IDE IntelliSense needs to be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Provide better monitoring tools of TimesTen daemon, servers and connections.
    • Improved support for APIs. The libraries lack the necessary code for applications to customize for applications using TimesTen.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    I've only worked with products that do one thing before, but there's so much that Cache offers versus piecing different services together manually. Not only does the product offer a more robust tool-set, but the support is wonderful and I've never encountered a better vendor in any industry in terms of how well they interact with their customers and care about helping you solve your problems. They want you to grow and to get better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Sybase does not have an in-memory database until version 15 so TimesTen was ideal for caching data. TimesTen has reliable replication and backing up mechanisms. Oracle takes longer to set up and use for most applications where as TimesTen is a smaller DBMS that is quick and easy to set up and use. TimesTen can connect to Oracle for caching data so using Oracle as a backend makes sense
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • Implementation time could be speeded up
    • It is very flexible and attractive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • TimesTen has had a positive impact from a developer's perspective because implementing TimesTen is quick and easy. The benefits of TimesTen can be seen almost instantly. For instance, the application start up time is faster, the data is easy to maintain and the performance is fast for TimesTen clients.
    • TimesTen has had a positive impact for the business because it can be made accessible to users via a GUI. This gives users transparency to the data at any time.
    • The negative impact is that once the TimesTen database has grown too large, the application should move to using Oracle database or else it suffers from performance degradation and stability issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    InterSystems Caché (legacy product) Screenshots

    Screenshot of The structure of InterSystems Caché Database Engine