Intruder vs. Kali Linux

When the infrastructure landscape and risk profile is not well known and is legacy, Intruder can scan and automate reporting on open security risks, as well as coordinate responses.

Incentivized

Kali is quite honestly appropriate for use on a Test Lab, a Virtual Machine, it will even run on a Raspberry Pi. It is the most popular tool used in most all training courses. It can be uses in home labs, work labs and production environments to perform real life scans for vulnerabilities among other things. It is the most popular tool for Cybersecurity tool.

Incentivized

• Auto scanning.
• New vulnerability detection.
• Alert levels.

Incentivized

• Provides high security.
• Does great job with penetration testing.
• Has good number of testing tools with in.

Incentivized

• Reports could contain more detail.

Incentivized

• Usage wise, it is tough for use by beginners. Can be improved.
• With Kali Linux have noticed driver related issues especially with Nvidia graphics cards.
• Kali Linux can be improved for use as a day to day OS.

Incentivized

Intruder focuses on scanning network blocks for your servers even if you don't know which services or hostnames are running on them, unlike Detectify which requires a domain or hostname to scan. The network port scanning of Intruder is also broader than many competitors.

Incentivized

The hard feature to be beat Kali with is the amount of preinstalled tools. I.e. Ubuntu is great but you would have to install each and every tool separately

Incentivized

• Improved security profile.
• Better reporting to stakeholders and clients of the current security risks.

Incentivized

• Till now Kali Linux have not made a single penny negative impact on our companies business , its so powerful and useful at the same time for our company.

Incentivized