Kaminario K2 (discontinued) vs. Serverless360

K2 works well in our mixed-use virtual environment. I would not hesitate to place any workload on K2, it has always performed well. We use fiber-channel connectivity as it replaced our large legacy storage array, replacing one rack of spinning disks with 4U of flash.

Incentivized

They have very transparent and reasonable pricing. Out of all the cost management tools our team has investigated, Serverless360 stands out for providing the most advantageous and efficient features that aid us in tracking expenses according to specific customers, features, or services. It’s ability to spot the cost spike is commendable.

• Great performance
• Great support
• Super-simple to use

Incentivized

• It provides comprehensive visibility of azure apps and manages several azure services in a safe way.
• It identifies and solves incidents efficiently and also pinpoints the root cause.
• Keeps track of enterprise wide information across integrations.

Incentivized

• Not well known, so third-party support is lacking
• Data reduction is good, but not as good as expected (actual 2.7:1)

Incentivized

• It could have the option of clicking on the resource and taking you directly to the Azure portal.

Incentivized

We performed a bake-off with K2 and one other vendor and they performed identically. K2 pricing was aggressive, performance was great, and it offered the features that we needed at a price that we could afford

Incentivized

• Installing K2 reduced runtime of one of our batch processes, freeing up one employee for other tasks.
• Less time managing storage.

Incentivized

• Provides us with a full view of azure territory.
• It monitors and speedily fixes incidents in azure apps minimizing time spent on troubleshooting.
• We can synch two different environs with different authentication rules.

Incentivized