Keysight Software Test Automation vs. mabl

I would definitely recommend [Eggplant Performance] as an automation and testing software. Outside of these capabilities there are other tools that are better.

Incentivized

We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature

Incentivized

• mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
• Organization - labels and flows make this easy
• Customer support!

Incentivized

• Installing and setting up initially could be easier
• Reporting tool can be improved
• Fails at times

Incentivized

• Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard

Incentivized

I have not used another tool exactly like this because Eggplant is awesome and we do not need another.

Incentivized

We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools

Incentivized

• Very easy
• Customer support very helpful
• Saves us a lot of time
• Helps us put out better products

Incentivized

• We are able to more quickly automate UI tests

Incentivized