Kingston SSD vs. SanDisk SSD

I think I cannot recommend it at all since our bad experience. There is no good scenario for an SSD which fails after 13 days of work.

It is well suited where cost is a concern. And less suited where top quality is a concern. See now cost is less for SanDisk so it is assumed that it could be possible that somehow somewhere quality might be compromised. So a situation where cost doesn't matter, only quality matters, then you must go for another.

Incentivized

• KC3000 read/write speed
• Average price
• 4TB size

• Speed.
• Durability.
• Performance.

Incentivized

• In my experience, it failed quickly, there is huge room to improve reliability...

• Cost friendly.
• Better speed.
• Toughness.

Incentivized

Samsung PRO series never failed in our equipments this is why we thought SSDs today are very reliable. It is not true for the Kingstons

As I had mentioned earlier the cost is the main positive point about SSD. The way SanDisk has maintained its cost and provided the performance is next-level. Samsung is also a good one. But it is costly as compared to SanDisk. Hence it will be less preferred. So SanDisk is better.

Incentivized

• Negative impact, since it failed

• Cost effective.
• Immediate solution.
• Better solution.

Incentivized