Kobiton vs. Playwright

Kobiton

Kobiton

10 Reviews and Ratings

Playwright

Playwright

36 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kobiton	Score 4.6 out of 10	N/A	Kobiton in Atlanta offers a mobile test suite, providing an integration to a wide variety of testing tools and partner services. The solution supports functional and performance testing, as well as scriptless automation of tests.	$75 per month
Playwright	Score 8.7 out of 10	N/A	A cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…	$0

Pricing

Kobiton

Playwright

Editions & Modules

Start Up: $75
per month 500 mins / month
Accelerate: $390
per month 3,000 mins / month
Scale: $9000
per year 7,500 mins / month
Enterprise: Custom

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kobiton	Playwright
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Kobiton	Playwright

Best Alternatives
	Kobiton	Playwright
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kobiton	Playwright
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (1 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kobiton	Playwright
Likelihood to Recommend	Kobiton When it comes to doing or performing testing on the applications or devices then Kobiton is the best option to go forward with. Kobiton is best for both manual and automation testing. It also comes with great features like appium scripts generation which really useful and less time-consuming and makes it really good to go with. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Microsoft Playwright is very well suited for any kind of frontend QA regression testing. It's perfect for ensuring that important features that are not often updated remain fully functional across updates or releases. It is not well suited for testing a feature that requires more developer updates before it is ready for end users. Playwright tests are not always simple to maintain if frequent updates are required to keep them relevant. Playwright can be used for API or database assertions as well, but it's not necessarily best suited for those scenarios. It does perform well enough to consider that use case for simplicity if Playwright is already relevant for any frontend QA regression tests that are needed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Kobiton No answers on this topic	Microsoft automation integrations support community features easy to use documentation Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Kobiton No answers on this topic	Microsoft UI API Performance Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Usability	Kobiton No answers on this topic	Microsoft I find Playwright very intuitive and generally do not have any trouble using it on a daily basis. However, I do have coworkers with more limited experience in software who have struggled immensely in learning to use Playwright properly. Playwright is very well documented which helps if you plan to use AI to help you write any test automation (which I generally don't recommend, but is an option). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Kobiton No answers on this topic	Microsoft We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Kobiton No answers on this topic	Microsoft Usable customisable extendable Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
ScreenShots