TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Leap vs. ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Leap

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AFounded in 2016, Leap is subscription-based software for home service contractors that automates steps in the sales process from estimating, proposals, and contracts to financing, payment capture, and e-signatures.

    $49

    per month per user

    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/ARisk Quantifier (RQ) translates cyber risk into clear financial terms, allowing security leaders to prioritize defenses and communicate impact in the language of business. By mapping MITRE ATT&CK techniques and vulnerabilities to financial loss scenarios, RQ enables cost-justified security decisions. Together with TI Ops and Polarity, RQ ensures that operational efforts align to risk-based priorities — bridging the gap between threat activity and executive decision-making.N/A
    Pricing
    LeapThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Editions & Modules
    Pro
    $49
    per month per user
    Premium
    $99
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $125
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LeapThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    LeapThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LeapThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Leap
    Leap (formerly JobProgress) helped us automate and simply our processes. We chose it over competitors because we were able to customize it to the different service offerings we provided - other platforms seem to be designed for one type of service or another making them problematic. We were able to reduce the number of software providers we use and integrate others that we were using separately. It is designed well to track [potential] jobs, but it does not work well for tracking business development opportunities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    Well-Suited Scenarios: Reporting to management where financial risk metrics are required. - Vulnerability prioritization when you need to rank issues by real exploit risk and financial/business impact. Less-Appropriate Scenarios: Fast-changing cloud environments where asset data needs updates too frequently for accurate models required all the time. - Incident investigation, as ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) is not designed for real-time check
    Read full review
    Pros
    Leap
    • Providing proposal viewing
    • Allowing clients to accept proposal terms electronically
    • Tracking project progress and payment status
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Provides scenario-based modeling to measure risk, which can be reduced through patches or new controls.
    • Delivers technical-to-business reporting that supports remediation planning and financial budget planning.
    • Ranks vulnerabilities by exploit risk and business impact
    • Quantifies cyber risk in financial terms using vulnerability, threat, and asset data.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Leap
    • Reporting
    • Deadlines on updates
    • Lists populate differently (e.g., alphabetical vs. order they were created)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Dashboards can be customized to offer more options, especially for technical teams that require deeper drill-downs and also more simpler and user-friendly.
    • Processing large data files can be slow sometimes, especially during large builds or bulk updates.
    • Risk modules sometimes need manual intervention for multi-client environments, which can be time-consuming.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Leap
    Had to reach out to support several times because interface is not intuitive and help files are sparse
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    I rate ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) an 8 because it’s generally easy to use once the integrations are set up. The dashboards, risk scores, and financial impact metrics are very straightforward and help make quick decisions for executives. However, the initial configuration and model tuning can be a bit complex it's not a perfect 10 for me.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Leap
    We evaluated close to ten other platforms including Dataforma, Job Nimbus, AccuLynx, Propeller, FCS, etc., but chose Leap (formerly JobProgress) because of the flexibility it offered - customize our service offerings and how jobs flow through our process, automation through the process, integration with other vendors, and ease of use for the office and field.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) stacked up better than RiskLens, better for our organization, is mainly because it integrates directly with our scanners, SIEM, and CMDB, allowing automatic, real-time risk monitoring. It also combines exploit intel, asset value, and vulnerability data more efficiently, giving us clearer technical priorities for the business impact. We chose ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier™ (RQ) because it provides faster, more actionable risk scoring with less manual modeling than RiskLens.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Leap
    • Multiple staff can access system in office and in the field
    • Can measure project profitability
    • Track follow up with prospective and current clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ThreatConnect
    • Improved alignment between IT, security, and business teams because risk is measured in financial terms, not just technical terms.
    • It gives leadership clear cost-based risk metrics, making it easier to justify security budgets and prioritize projects.
    • Initial setup and data integration require time and more disruption to the existing setup
    • Risk models sometimes need tuning, adding extra operational overhead.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots