The Lexis® service provides access to a collection of case law, statutes and regulations, plus 40K+ news sources, 83B+ Public Records, 700M+ company profiles and documents, as well as exclusives across all content types.
N/A
Lexis Advance Quicklaw
Score9.5 out of 10
N/A
LexisNexis supports legal research with Lexis Advance Quicklaw, its Canadian legal research database acquired in 2002.
Lexis is well-suited to locating case documents, especially trial court documents in state courts, that are otherwise hard to find elsewhere. The system is way more efficient than searching individual state court dockets. So it improves my efficiency.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Well suited for case law research across many areas of law in Canada. Specifically found that it works well for extensive research where there are lots of things going on. It works well for reviewing precedents that need to be considered to make decisions for taking a decision. Less suitable for situations where we need access to real documents from the courts such as decisions or motions as Lexis doesn’t have that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it is very usable. I do wish that the AI was better and I could rely on it more. Often, I find that Claude does a better job of getting case law research than Protoge does. But for basic case searches, research, and investigation, I find that it is easy to use
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Lexis has the history that iWave does not. Plus it has the legal search. The business search is better in terms of News (iWave doesn't have one), but iWave does a better job of aggregating more useful sites. Also, iWave has philanthropic gifts, which is useful to us. We actually use both and would make a stink if we had to choose
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Lexis Advance is way better in terms of usability and search features. The content is pretty much the same for both platforms except in Litigation where WestLaw is much stronger than Lexis. However, the Feature functionality of Lexis is a lot better to keep users efficient and productive and collaboration is also good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
