LingoHub vs. Lokalise

A multinational company is managing a large-scale localization project with translators, reviewers, and project managers spread across different countries. They need a platform that allows seamless collaboration, ensures translation consistency, and maintains version control without delays caused by time zone differences or manual file exchanges.

Incentivized

Invited by the Vendor

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

We used the service for almost 2 years, initially the decision was very tight when comparing to similar providers. There are many services that can do similar functions to what Lokalise to, given the many providers existing, if I were to choose again I'd be looking for lower price and better cancellation policies, versus aggressive sales tactics that result in loss of trust for a couple bucks.

• Translation
• Localization
• Prefill function

• optimizing translation processes
• offering a good experience for translators, managers and developers
• great communication options between translators and task owners

• Updates
• Interface changes

• Refund policy is unfortunately non existent, charging 11 months extra than use
• Integration got broken and cascaded the failure to the deployment pipeline
• Interface can be confusing and slow at times

Overall it's very easy to use. It has a well design and intuitive GUI and its customer support is fast enough when there is something unclear.

Lokalise is definitely one of the best tools on the market

• Lingohub improved our localization efficiency by automating workflows, reducing manual tasks, and enhancing team collaboration
• By enabling high-quality translations and maintaining consistent branding across languages, Lingohub has supported our global business objectives
• No negative impacts