LogicManager vs. MetricStream Platform

It is more suitable to supply organizations with focused and improved risk management processes. I like how its vendor and third party risk management solution is a centralized solution that provides risk taxonomy infrastructure. This bridges the gap in the risk program, allocates resources effectively, keeps all the risk information in one place, and standardizes the risk management process.

Incentivized

MetricStream is well suited for when you need to pull a report into Excel for further analysis. It is not good for when information needs to be entered as this is all done manually by analysts and managers. If we can implement a way to take parts of uploaded documents and have the system automatically enter the information in the designated fields in MetricStream, it would cut out lots of manual work for our department.

Incentivized

• Easy to navigate.

Incentivized

• Speed/efficiency.
• Missing functionality: Uploading documents (Excel sheets) into MetricStream and being able to pull information from that form into the program.
• Improve number of outages and time that it is out for.

Incentivized

Archer is more risk-management-friendly in that it has a better interface and more room to conduct risk-related tasks and pull reports.

Incentivized

• It keeps records of all of our vendors and the corresponding documents.
• Other departments can access information on vendors.

Incentivized