TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    mabl

    Score8 out of 10
    N/Amabl is a regression test automation tool with test output visualization and performance regression for tracking the perceived speed of web apps and sites, from the company of the same name in Boston.N/A

    MOZARK

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AMOZARK is an App Experience Testing Platform that lets users perform integrated experience, functional, and performance testing. The solution helps users build apps that engage your customers and drive revenue. The platform is powered by following products: App Experience: Even small lags in an app can lead to abandonments. Users can monitor an app’s performance in real-time to detect and fix customer issues pro-actively. App…N/A
    Pricing
    mablMOZARK
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    mablMOZARK
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    mablMOZARK
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of mabl and MOZARK
    Feature
    mabl
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    MOZARK
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Scheduling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Object Recognition10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    mablMOZARK
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    mablMOZARK
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    mablMOZARK
    Likelihood to Recommend
    mabl
    We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MOZARK Pte.
    It is well suited for small-scale applications and freelance developers. It has in-built performance measuring criteria that give good insights about the application use. Overall it is good but it does need improvements in performance measuring metrics and more flexibility in reporting analytics for the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    mabl
    • mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
    • Organization - labels and flows make this easy
    • Customer support!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MOZARK Pte.
    • Dashboard for application performance report and analysis
    • Support for integration with versioning tools like Git helps to quickly move the fixes and test the application in real-time
    • Realtime monitoring gives details about how the application will perform under different loads
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    mabl
    • Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MOZARK Pte.
    • Documentation needs improvement
    • No 24/7 customer support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    mabl
    We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MOZARK Pte.
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    mabl
    • We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MOZARK Pte.
    • Easy to use interface
    • Does not require in-depth training or knowledge to start and work with the tool
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    mabl Screenshots

    Screenshot of Testing the login flow of the Freshbooks web application. Each test step is created by interacting with your application and is recorded in the mabl Trainer.Screenshot of Parameterized JavaScript enables everyone to contribute to building automated tests.Screenshot of View of mabl's insights and reporting. In this view, we're looking at mabl's release coverage dashboard, which includes passing rate, quality metrics, and more.Screenshot of Quickly create Jira tickets directly from test failures. All of the test execution data will be automatically pulled into the issue in Jira.Screenshot of Setting up a test as a part of your workflow in GitHub Actions.

    MOZARK Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot