ManageEngine CloudSpend vs. Virtana

ManageEngine CloudSpend

Virtana

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ManageEngine CloudSpend	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	ManageEngine CloudSpend is a cost management solution for public clouds aiming to provide advanced analytics for IT and enable businesses to visualize runaway expenditure and implement budget controls in clouds. Being a SaaS-based cloud cost management software, CloudSpend helps provide precise insights into the cloud cost accrued, manage and optimize spending, and take data-driven cloud decisions.	$0 AWS bill
Virtana	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Virtana delivers enterprise-grade deep hybrid infrastructure observability, enabling organizations to achieve visibility and control across their entire IT estate. The platform unifies monitoring of on-premises, cloud, and Kubernetes environments, to transform complex infrastructure management into a strategic advantage. Core Platform Capabilities Deep Infrastructure Observability: · Automated topology discovery and mapping · Real…	$0

Pricing

ManageEngine CloudSpend

Virtana

Editions & Modules

Up to $3,000/month: $0.00
AWS bill
Above $100,000/month: 0.5%
AWS bill (billed monthly)
$3,000 to $100,000/month: 0.8%
AWS bill (billed monthly)

Free: $0
Pro: $5
per month per device

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine CloudSpend	Virtana
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Volume discounts are available (600+ devices / month) A device is any running AWS EC2 or Azure VM evaluated by Virtana Optimize in a given month

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ManageEngine CloudSpend	Virtana
Considered Both Products	ManageEngine CloudSpend No answer on this topic	Virtana John Anderson Lead Application Engineer IV Chose Virtana We selected Zenoss because we had been using it for years before these other solutions were considered nearly robust enough to potentially be a viable alternative to Zenoss. Our familiarity with the interface and the tool set made it an easy choice for us to continue to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Virtana Zenoss not just monitor the Hybrid Cloud, it also perform the Event Management and that gives edge on others Incentivized Helpful? AO Adam O'Connor CTO Chose Virtana We don't have much to say bad about other services. We just found that Metricly was a good fit for us. And their customer support is really really good. So if we get stuck we simply reach out for help which hasn't been very often. We didn't get that kind of support from other … Incentivized Helpful? Mark Swanholm VP SaaS Operations Chose Virtana We strongly prefer Metricly for AWS Cost Analysis -- whereas other tools are easier to use on a traditional monitoring basis. To be clear, Merticly's monitoring tools are GREAT, but they require tuning and manual setup that we didn't have the time for on a small Platform … Incentivized Helpful? Steve Garnjobst Senior Solutions Architect Chose Virtana IBM Netcool Network Management Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	ManageEngine CloudSpend	Virtana
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	Amazon CloudWatch Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Turbonomic Score 8.7 out of 10	ManageEngine Site24x7 Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.9 out of 10	ManageEngine Site24x7 Score 10.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ManageEngine CloudSpend	Virtana
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.8 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ManageEngine CloudSpend	Virtana
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Zenoss is one of the most economical low cost monitoring/AIOPS tools available in the market. This goes excellent when complete infra is monitoring by itself however if its receiving the events from other monitoring tool then the Event management uses cases will be limited. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	The flexibility to monitor almost anything. The graphical interface available for servers and database planning helps to make it easier. Easy to integrate other solutions under zenoss. Incentivized AK Ankit Kumar Technical Support Engineer Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Support for streaming data is on the roadmap must currently be addressed via a third-party app. For some customers, a hybrid on-prem/cloud model may be a better fit than a pure cloud model. The onsite collectors offer some, but not all, of this functionality. Tighter integration with third-party (AppDynamics, etc) and/or built-in app performance tools. Steve Garnjobst Senior Solutions Architect Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Anytime we've had issues they have been very responsive and professional. Incentivized AO Adam O'Connor CTO Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	We selected Zenoss because we had been using it for years before these other solutions were considered nearly robust enough to potentially be a viable alternative to Zenoss. Our familiarity with the interface and the tool set made it an easy choice for us to continue to upgrade and use the product. John Anderson Lead Application Engineer IV Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	We were able to save double-digit percentages on our monthly bill due to cutting back on hardware that was not needed. We save time by not having to run across various dashboards and instead have a central place to monitor our infrastructure. Incentivized AO Adam O'Connor CTO Read full review
ScreenShots	ManageEngine CloudSpend Screenshots