Metasploit vs. NetworkMiner

It is easy to use with sufficient documentation on how to use the tools for end users or newbies. Experienced testers will find it easy to customise and configure the test cases. Just wished that I could have taken up a course on using this tool in my study days so that I could had explored more and improved my familiarity with the tool, unlike when working where access and time to explore the other features of the tool is limited

Incentivized

The NetworkMiner software in my view is a software recommended for small and/or large companies, it may be less useful in small companies or offices, but it can also be used for simple analysis. In medium and large scenarios, it is very useful in analyzing network traffic and identifying possible security flaws, password exposures and weaknesses in the security of solutions and/or technologies used in the internal network.

Incentivized

• Easy to use.
• Many exploits available.
• Multi-platform.

Incentivized

• Credential capture exclusive tab
• Graphical interface for data analysis
• Exclusive intuitive host connection listing tab

Incentivized

• More robust menus
• Better plugin inter-operation

Incentivized

• MAC listing of hosts in listed connections
• Possibility to start capture focusing on only a specific host

Incentivized

We don't use it.

Incentivized

Metasploit is the most well-known tool in the average pen tester's toolkit. It's hard to compare to its neighbor's due to its size and following.

Incentivized

• Positive: Improves efficiency of our network penetration testing operations.
• Positive: Allows for collaboration and information sharing during a penetration test.

Incentivized

• Increase in the possibility of identifying security flaws in trafficked data
• Monitor network traffic easily with no financial investment

Incentivized