TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatio vs. Oracle Enterprise Single Sign-On Suite Plus

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatio

    N/AN/AN/AN/A

    Oracle ESSO

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AOracle Enterprise Single Sign-On is a single sign-on (SSO) solution, originally named Passlogix and owned and supported by Oracle since 2010.N/A
    Pricing
    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatioOracle ESSO
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatioOracle ESSO
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatioOracle ESSO
    Small Businesses
    Atlassian Crowd
    Score6 out of 10
    Atlassian Crowd
    Score6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Score6.8 out of 10
    Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Score6.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatioOracle ESSO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.6
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Mi-Token multi- factor authenticatioOracle ESSO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Mi-Token
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Good if you want a temporary solution to too many passwords.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Mi-Token
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • Flexible to work with most web sites and thick clients
    • Avoids users having to type their passwords repeatedly
    • Fairly performant
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Mi-Token
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • This tool is essentially a hack, making the user experience pretty weak. For example, we use it in an application which has a box to type your password. Every time you enter some data, ESSO steals the focus and types your password into the box, even if you aren't about to submit the form requiring the password.
    • This tool creates a 2nd CN in the directory and this broke some of our applications which were only expecting a single CN per user in the directory. Why can't it use a traditional database instead?
    • This tool caused performance issues with Putty. It would peg our CPUs at 100% if the user had Putty running. It took a very long time to resolve the issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Mi-Token
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    There's no substitute for properly developed applications that delegate authentication to an external system like Active Directory or a cloud identity provider. That way, the issues with screen scraping and constantly-breaking integration are solved permanently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Mi-Token
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    • We spent a lot of time implementing it on different applications. However, because it uses screen scraping, every time our apps upgraded, it broke the integration with ESSO, so we had to keep fixing the integration. After a few years, we have stopped integrating new apps with it due to this headache.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots