Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Sensagraph
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources. | N/A |
Sensagraph | N/A | N/A | Sensagraph is an agentless external security scanning platform that shows you your web applications the way an attacker sees them: from the public internet, with nothing to install and no code to change. Point Sensagraph at a domain, verify ownership once, and it maps any app's real attack surface across five focused capabilities: Web Application Vulnerability Detection (SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and the rest of the OWASP Top 10), Web Server Configuration Analysis,… | $19 per month |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Sensagraph | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Sensagraph is priced as a simple, self-serve subscription with no setup fees, no long procurement cycle, and no mandatory sales call to get started. A free plan includes 1 full external scan per month, so you can evaluate the product on your own domain before paying anything. Paid plans are built to scale with how much you scan and how many domains you monitor, which makes the product a good fit for a range of buyers: solo developers securing a single site, SaaS teams watching their production environment, and agencies managing many client domains from one account. There are no agents to license per host and no per-endpoint charges, so pricing stays predictable as your footprint grows. Every plan includes the same core scanning engine and the client-ready PDF report, so you are choosing based on scan volume and domain coverage, not being locked out of key security features at lower tiers. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Sensagraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
97% Would buy again 66 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
95% Delivers good value for the price 61 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 65 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 55 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
98% Implementation went as expected 57 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Sensagraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score9 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Sensagraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.9 | - |
| Usability | 7.8 | - |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Sensagraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots | Sensagraph Screenshots |








