Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month per user
Splunk AppDynamics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
AppDynamics is an APM and Mobile APM program, with application mapping and predictive capabilities. These capacities enable automated remediation and code-level diagnostics in real time. It can be deployed on-premise or as a SaaS.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Editions & Modules
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Features
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.0
10 Ratings
5% below category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
24 Ratings
4% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
API for custom integration7.723 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins7.821 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
28 Ratings
6% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability8.924 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.827 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.8
29 Ratings
6% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.625 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.829 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.028 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
29 Ratings
9% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Accounts payable8.928 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.627 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.816 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.418 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.818 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.819 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
25 Ratings
9% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking8.525 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management8.421 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.1
27 Ratings
3% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Pricing8.524 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.824 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold9.121 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.612 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.2
19 Ratings
9% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Billing Management8.217 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.418 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.313 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.215 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.218 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
8 Ratings
14% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.5
11 Ratings
7% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling7.410 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools6.810 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
8 Ratings
18% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management6.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.8
15 Ratings
11% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring6.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository7.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management7.212 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.3
11 Ratings
23% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Risk Repository6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management7.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.310 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.6
9 Ratings
10% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
9 Ratings
8% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Production Process Design8.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution8.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.8
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Forecasting6.911 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.911 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.211 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.0
8 Ratings
21% above category average
Splunk AppDynamics
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.27 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
-
Ratings
Splunk AppDynamics
8.9
84 Ratings
14% above category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings9.284 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.780 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings9.082 Ratings
Predictive capabilities00 Ratings8.682 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings9.381 Ratings
Collaboration tools00 Ratings8.970 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings9.154 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.753 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(29 ratings)
7.9
(75 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(9 ratings)
7.8
(12 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralSplunk AppDynamics
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is well suited for inventory management in all aspects. Its accessibility, along with my other apps, when out of the office is unparalleled. I find it easy to work with on a desktop or laptop; however, it could use some work on a mobile device.
Read full review
Cisco
Platforms for software as a service (SaaS) frequently cater to a large number of users with a variety of needs and usage patterns. Because AppDynamics offers multi-tenant monitoring capabilities to track performance across various customer environments, it is a good choice for SaaS platform monitoring. SaaS providers can maximize resource utilization, proactively detect and resolve performance issues, and provide a dependable and consistent user experience for their clients with AppDynamics.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Automate the creation of bills of materials for production. We can now generate a BoM from a sales order.
  • Organization of all data pertaining to thousands of parts, assemblies, and finished goods. Engineering and purchasing have a common portal.
  • We can create sales orders from quotations instead of re-entering them (this did require some bolt-on software). Less redundant work with fewer entry errors.
  • Accounting can provide reports based on specific criteria stored in NAV. We can pull better and more detailed intelligence.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Business Transaction Monitoring is one of its signature strengths. This represents a major differentiator from generic infrastructure monitoring tools.
  • AI‑driven anomaly detection and intelligent alerting provide a significant advantage over traditional monitoring.
  • When combined with Splunk AppDynamics, full‑stack observability becomes a key part of Cisco/Splunk’s unified observability strategy.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Some functions could be a bit more user friendly, intuitive.
  • Better migration from previous ERP software (especially other Microsoft products). "Growing pains" associated with change?! Maybe.
  • A few redundancies and procedural missteps on menus and tabs can make the portal a bit crowded.
Read full review
Cisco
  • AppDynamics may enhance its capacity to track transactions through complex distributed systems and microservices, offering a more comprehensive understanding of application behavior.
  • Better search and filtering capabilities would enable engineers to quickly obtain deeper context by drilling down into individual data points.
  • AppDynamics might be more widely available to engineers and organizations if it offered subscription plans or tiered pricing options.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Read full review
Cisco
cause it achieves all our targets and we are satisfied with using Splunk also stable no technical challenges or problem caused by Splunk a lot for innovative integrations also all layers are using splunk NOC team , DEV team, application support team, managers security team also in forcasting for EA team
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Best in terms of reporting or coming up with a great dashboard. Seamlessly collaborated with teams without depending on particular device as its web version is the buddy for people with work flexibility. Licensing price and integrations can be the areas of improvement and can simplify the interface which will be easy for a new user.
Read full review
Cisco
Splunk AppDynamics is great product that has positively maintained solid application workflows. It has simple and clean UI that displays graphical representation of our database and application behaviour. It gives us an opportunity to customize and set most reliable alerts and data configurations that aligns with our policies. It is easy to monitor operation hypothesis and lower RCA if you identify application coding errors.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the availability of Splunk AppDynamics as a 9. Overall, the platform has proven to be highly reliable and is available when we need it. It consistently supports our monitoring and performance management needs across critical applications and infrastructure. There have been occasional issues with platform availability, such as intermittent application errors or brief unplanned outages. However, these instances have been infrequent and typically resolved quickly, minimizing any significant impact on operations. The stability and uptime of the platform have met our expectations, and we continue to rely on it as a core component of our APM strategy.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the performance of Splunk AppDynamics as a 6. While the platform generally delivers the expected functionality, we’ve experienced periodic slowness—particularly with page loads and report generation. These performance issues can be frustrating, especially when trying to quickly access critical data during incident response or analysis. One contributing factor may be our use of a shared controller environment with other enterprises, which can introduce resource contention and impact overall responsiveness. In some cases, this has led to delays in accessing dashboards or completing complex queries. Despite these challenges, the platform remains a valuable tool, and we’re exploring options to improve performance, including potential changes to our deployment model and support agreements.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Read full review
Cisco
AppDynamics has its own community site that includes forums and a knowledge base. On the forums, you can converse with other members of the community and ask technical questions as you have them. Though this forum isn’t filled with people there are active members for you to gain some valuable insights.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the online training for Splunk AppDynamics as a 7. The training was generally acceptable and covered the core concepts and functionality of the platform. However, there were some challenges with communication during sessions—particularly around clarity and instructor engagement—which occasionally made it difficult to fully grasp certain topics. Additionally, the training could benefit from being more focused and tailored to specific roles or use cases. A more structured approach with clearer learning paths and practical, hands-on examples would enhance the overall effectiveness and help users apply the knowledge more confidently in real-world scenarios.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate our satisfaction with the implementation of Splunk AppDynamics as a 9. The deployment process was smooth and well-coordinated, thanks to the collaborative efforts between Cisco Professional Services, our internal business stakeholders, and agency technical teams. Key Insights from the Implementation: Cross-functional Collaboration Was Critical: Engaging both technical and business teams early in the process ensured that the platform was configured to meet a wide range of operational and strategic needs. Value of Expert Guidance: Cisco’s Professional Services provided invaluable expertise, helping us navigate complex configurations and tailor the solution to our environment. Their involvement accelerated deployment and ensured best practices were followed. Importance of Planning and Communication: A well-defined implementation roadmap and regular communication across teams helped us stay aligned, manage expectations, and address challenges proactively. Scalable Architecture: We designed the implementation with scalability in mind, allowing us to expand usage across agencies and applications without major rework. Overall, the implementation laid a strong foundation for our APM program and positioned us for long-term success.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies that I support to only call me once or twice a month after the first year. This is due to the ease of tracking down problems and errors and the ability for a developer to provide the end-user with routines that automatically correct the most basic kind of error
Read full review
Cisco
It is distinguished from these programs because the platform provides visualizations of application processes, showing the interplay between various parts and services. Understanding the architecture of complicated apps and finding their weak spots is greatly aided by this.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
While the overall value of the Splunk AppDynamics platforms is strong, the pricing structure and contract terms can be complex and difficult to navigate. Unit pricing, licensing tiers, and billing frequency are not always intuitive, which can make it challenging to align purchases with the State’s evolving needs. I rely heavily on our Account Manager to help interpret and tailor the licensing model to our specific requirements. Their support has been invaluable in ensuring we make informed decisions. The most impactful change would be to simplify the licensing and pricing model. Clearer documentation, more transparent pricing tiers, and streamlined purchasing processes would significantly improve the experience and reduce administrative overhead.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the overall scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a 7. The platform is designed to support enterprise-wide deployments across multiple departments and sites, and it performs well in large-scale environments. Its architecture allows for horizontal scaling and supports a wide range of application types and infrastructures. However, the agent management and deployment process can be complex and time-consuming, especially when onboarding a large number of applications or systems. Coordinating agent installation, configuration, and updates across diverse environments requires careful planning and often significant manual effort. Streamlining these processes—perhaps through more centralized management tools or automation—would enhance scalability and reduce operational overhead. Despite these challenges, once deployed, AppDynamics scales effectively and provides consistent performance and visibility across the enterprise.
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Our experience with the professional services team supporting Splunk AppDynamics has been exceptional. They demonstrated deep technical expertise, strong collaboration skills, and a clear understanding of our business objectives. Their guidance was instrumental in the successful implementation of our APM program and platform integration. The rating of 9 reflects our high level of satisfaction, with a small margin left to acknowledge that continuous improvement is always possible. Overall, their support has been a key factor in the success of our deployment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Automation processing, including EDI functionality, has increased employee efficiency and prevented the need for adding additional employees.
  • Implementation of the warehouse functionality, including cycle counts, has resulted in better inventory control/less shrinkage.
  • Implementation of e-Ship and e-Receive, has resulted in greater efficiency and order accuracy.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Through the identification of performance bottlenecks and efficient resource allocation, AppDynamics has contributed to cost savings and resource optimization. This has a direct positive impact on our overall return on investment.
  • While AppDynamics' numerous capabilities help maximize efficiency, they may place a strain on your system. Organizations with limited infrastructure capacity may have difficulties and therefore give this serious thought before implementing it.
Read full review
ScreenShots