Microtica vs. Upsun

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microtica
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Microtica’s mission is to help teams get more done with less. It has 3 main modules: Developer Portal, Control Centre and Cloud Waste Manager. Through the Developer Portal UI, devs can access a library of battle-tested components, create and replicate Cloud environments and deploy apps through self-service. Through the Control Centre, operators can manage more complex deployments, create libraries of custom components and share them with…N/A
Upsun
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Platform.sh helps companies of all sizes, from SaaS entrepreneurs looking to build, run, and scale their websites and web applications.N/A
Pricing
MicroticaUpsun
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MicroticaUpsun
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$99 per project/monthNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
MicroticaUpsun
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Microtica
-
Ratings
Upsun
9.3
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Scalability00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MicroticaUpsun
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MicroticaUpsun
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MicroticaUpsun
Likelihood to Recommend
Microtica
No answers on this topic
Upsun formerly Platform.sh
In our organisation we are the only team that uses Platform.sh to host any site. This was a cost effective way for us as we were using Acquia Cloud earlier for these websites. We mostly use Platform.sh for those sites which are always in development as it is simpler and faster to handle these operations in Platform.sh. Then we do a lift and shift to Acquia as we move more towards the go live and post production maintenance side.
Read full review
Pros
Microtica
No answers on this topic
Upsun formerly Platform.sh
  • As this is a PaaS it mitigates the complexities of a Cloud infrastructure like Acquia
  • We are easily able to integrate our sites with different technologies like Python and Rest
  • Helps us in providing Continuous Development cloud deployment hosting solution
Read full review
Cons
Microtica
No answers on this topic
Upsun formerly Platform.sh
  • Platform.sh is not for beginners in my opinion. It has a good amount of learning curve in my opinion.
  • As this is a PaaS, teams habituated with cloud infrastructure may miss the server side support from their cloud teams. I believe you will have to work on server bugs more on your own.
  • During normal maintenance periods, integrations may fail if you are working on your sites in that time, in my experience.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microtica
No answers on this topic
Upsun formerly Platform.sh
In our team we use Platform.sh mostly while sites are in developmental phase. Then we do a lift and shift to either Acquia or AWS depending on the type of sites we have. Platform.sh is really cost effective and more fluid in terms of Continuous Development hence the usage. After said development is done, we generally lift and shift to Acquia for more content heavy sites and to AWS for more transaction oriented sites.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microtica
No answers on this topic
Upsun formerly Platform.sh
  • Continuous development for sites in build has been fluid
  • Platform.sh is really cost effective when comparing to AWS or Acquia Cloud
  • On the other side, lack of server side support demands a big learning curve from its users in my opinion.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Upsun Screenshots

Screenshot of