MOZARK vs. XCTest

It is well suited for small-scale applications and freelance developers. It has in-built performance measuring criteria that give good insights about the application use. Overall it is good but it does need improvements in performance measuring metrics and more flexibility in reporting analytics for the application.

Incentivized

It is very useful to add it mainly at the beginning of the app when each feature is finished and if the greatest importance of the app is its stability and a quick way to fix errors that are made during the changes. Do it when the app is finished; it's going to be quite time-consuming; however, applying it will go a long way in making sure the code hasn't been broken by changes and improvements.

Incentivized

• Dashboard for application performance report and analysis
• Support for integration with versioning tools like Git helps to quickly move the fixes and test the application in real-time
• Realtime monitoring gives details about how the application will perform under different loads

Incentivized

• Basic unit level testing of iOS apps/games and functionalities
• Xcode Test Recorder - mostly a feature for UI tests but as XCTest is related with XCUITest the UI recording is possible with Xcode environment.

Incentivized

• Documentation needs improvement
• No 24/7 customer support

Incentivized

• Occasionally confusing
• Fails with automated builds without giving a good reason
• Not super flexible

Incentivized

I haven't test any

Incentivized

• Easy to use interface
• Does not require in-depth training or knowledge to start and work with the tool

Incentivized

• Faster way to know which issues appeared and fixed it.
• Easy way to install and teach to the programmers.
• More time invested on the project to implement.

Incentivized