TrustRadius

NetApp MetroCluster vs. Percona XtraDB Cluster

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NetApp MetroCluster
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
NetApp MetroCluster software is a solution that combines array-based clustering with synchronous replication to deliver continuous availability and zero data loss at the lowest cost. The vendor states administration of the array-based cluster is simpler because the dependencies and complexity normally associated with hostbased clustering are eliminated. MetroCluster immediately duplicates mission-critical data on a transaction-by-transaction basis, providing uninterrupted access to applications…N/A
Percona XtraDB Cluster
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Percona XtraDB Cluster (PXC) is a high availability, open-source, MySQL clustering solution that helps enterprises minimize unexpected downtime and data loss, reduce costs, and improve the performance and scalability of database environments. The vendor states PXC can support critical business applications in the most demanding public, private, and hybrid cloud environments. Percona XtraDB Cluster (PXC) aims to preserve, secure, and protect data and revenue streams by providing…N/A
Pricing
NetApp MetroClusterPercona XtraDB Cluster
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NetApp MetroClusterPercona XtraDB Cluster
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details—Free and open-source
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetApp MetroClusterPercona XtraDB Cluster
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
NetApp MetroClusterPercona XtraDB Cluster
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NetApp MetroClusterPercona XtraDB Cluster
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
NetApp MetroCluster is suited for applications which require 100% uptime with no data loss. It is suitable for organizations who have the need to move their NAS services and workloads to another data center with minimal downtime and configuration. Due to the cost of the product, it is not well suited for NAS file shares that require greater than zero RPO and RTO's. NetApp asynchronous is better suited for this type of data.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Percona
No answers on this topic
Pros
NetApp
  • Data deduplication, compression, and compaction provide great savings compared to traditional host based storage
  • Multiprotocol support (NAS and SAN) provide great flexibility
  • Ability to easily run your workloads from either data center with minimal effort and no disruption was the key selling point
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Percona
No answers on this topic
Cons
NetApp
  • I would like to see more highly intelligent monitoring that can help determine where latency is coming from. Eg. Host, Array, Network or Fabric issues
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Percona
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
Have not used or evaluated any other NAS synchronous products.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Percona
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • By moving critical application data away from older based technology such as host based mirroring and to a centralized array based replication, the complexity of managing data from multiple source and destination servers has been removed.
  • The number of incidents compared to our previous legacy configuration is huge. Data uptime has been 100% available since the migration to NetApp MetroCluster.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Percona
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots