TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vs. Tenable Security Center

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMobile Security Framework (MobSF) is an automated, all-in-one mobile application (Android/iOS/Windows) pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. MobSF support mobile app binaries (APK, IPA & APPX) along with zipped source code and provides REST APIs for integration with CI/CD or DevSecOps pipeline. The Dynamic Analyzer helps you to perform runtime security assessment and interactive instrumented testing.N/A

    Tenable Security Center

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
    Pricing
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Tenable
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) and Tenable Security Center
    Feature
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Tenable Security Center
    9.6
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) and Tenable Security Center
    Feature
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
    -
    Ratings
    Tenable Security Center
    9.6
    1 Ratings
    14% above category average
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Metasploit
    Score9 out of 10
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.4
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)Tenable Security Center
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    [Tenable.sc (formerly SecurityCenter)] does very well for internal scanning for vulnerabilities, however it needs to be combined with Tenable.io in order to do cloud scanning.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Scan for vulnerabilities
    • Scan for bad coding
    • Give suggestions on fixes for security issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Vulnerability management from one place
    • Maximum endpoint visibility
    • Easy to set up and plan the structure
    • Support desk quickly responses
    • Well-prepared documentation
    • Broad scanning type
    • Supports various compliance standards
    • User groups allows coordination between teams
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • The UI is not that user friendly
    • The documentation could be easier to understand
    • An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Centralized vulnerability management with sensors.
    • Network health assessment and Incident response.
    • For alerting or notification, it should also support the SMS gateway.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    based on product capabilities and usage
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable
    On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud with theirs. Tenable io product as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
    • We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
    • The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tenable
    • Create internal/operational efficiencies
    • Improve compliance & risk management
    • Cost management
    • Solid vulnerability scanner
    • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots