Arcsight by OpenText vs. Symantec Content & Malware Analysis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcsight by OpenText
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
A combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation.N/A
Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Symantec Content & Malware Analysis is an application which provides advanced threat detection and threat hunting through advanced machine learning, based on intelligence gathered from ProxySG, threat intelligence services, and other sources.N/A
Pricing
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Arcsight by OpenText
5.5
5 Ratings
35% below category average
Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility6.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(7 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arcsight by OpenTextSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
In the current lot of hundreds of SIEM solutions out there in the market, ArcSight ESM is fairly less expensive with strong fundamentals in place. The log ingestion, correlation are very well performing and totally worth ROI. However, the tool has lost its way when it comes to staying abreast with current feature curve of SIEM technology and the evolution has not been done by MicroFocus. Search times are high and there is no major plug-in that has been introduced as part of the product life cycle.
Read full review
Broadcom
If you have Symantec based environment including Symantec proxy and endpoints, Content and Malware Analysis is the obvious choice. You can't run the CAS-MAS as a standalone deployment, you need proxies or ICAP supported devices capable to send the files/URLS. It's not a network security device where you can flow/direct the traffic to C/MAS. It does not have UBA, NBA or NTR features, it is just working for analyzing files as expected.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Integration with smart logger and ESM to create rules and easy management of the same.
  • Easy integration with all end point security management tool(IPS/IDS, Firewall, Anti-Virus) and their consolidated output at a single place to effectively rectifying true and false positives.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • 0 day detection and prevenion
  • Flawless integration with Symantec Ecosystem
  • Integration with other vendors supporting ICAP is also working
  • Custom and golden image support
  • High performance on busy environments
  • Many threats are already detected and prevented through the CAS, it improves the performance drastically.
  • Already builtin virustotal integration
  • Reference to updates and updates information where I can see the product/service detecting which APTs
  • Multiple Antivirus engines which you can select/subscribe
  • Manual submission of file is supported through the gui
  • URL manual submission is also supported
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Even though integration is good but not complete yet as there are a lot of new popular apps which Arcsight can't integrate with natively.
  • UI can be improved.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • API support is lacking
  • Symantec/Broadcom security vision in general
  • Symantec support is not perfect
  • You can't run the product as a standalone network device
  • No packet capture capabiliy or work in span mode
  • You need a dedicated hardware to make it run
  • You need to buy
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Overall, it is a good investment in order for an organization to stay compliant and stay secure from all the wild things happening. It is definitely a cost effective tool with some good features including correlation, log storage, reporting and dashboards. If a customer is looking for advanced set of features, then I would highly not recommend this.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
I personally haven't reached the support team, however, the engineers never complained about the Arcsight support team. We had some issues with the tool in the past but every time we reached the support, all issues were resolved in a timely manner.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
ArcSight Intelligence easily provides visibility to understand the logs and monitor the different devices .have features to manage multiple client with asingle console.searching is little bit hectic but we can mange these thing while using its filter creation process. It costs low comparing to any other SIEM tool and nearly scan satisfied any clients requirements.
Read full review
Broadcom
We have been using many solutions even tested nearly all available 0day sandbox solutions in the market. We choose Symantec CMA as we have already Symantec endpoint protection/EDR on the client, Symantec proxy for the web access, SCMA fits our environment. We have a big bargain when we puchase lots of equipment from the Symantec. Detection and prevention is very good at SCMA but some constant issues; like the product is not designed for heterogeneous environments, we can not integrate the SCMA with WAFs, it's lacking in api and request/reply calls. There's no file scanning, discover the option. SIEM integration is not smooth. I can not run some of the SOAR playbooks through the SCMA.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • It's a good SIEM solution. Doesn't have much negative impact.
  • Customization is the best part.
  • Good reporting features.
  • Does require good hardware configuration.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • 0-day and APT risk is covered by the SCMA
  • As the SSL is inspected and analyzed at Bluecoat proxy servers, hidden threats, malicous files are passed to SCMA to be analyzed.
  • Getting full visibility at file trajectory level
  • As it's a full proxy and ICAP integration, we are sure that the files are to analyzed and scanned for malicious activity. This is a big plus compared to NGFW analyze concept, as the NGFWs have special failsafe mechanisms allowing bypass of file analysis. SCMA fully catches the hidden threats.
  • Flawless integration with Bluecoat systems is a big plus, customers are getting the same type of messages within their browsers.
  • A negative impact is the standardization when I deploy SCAM to one of our locations. Then the auditors demand the same coverage within other areas and it comes with the cost. Especially maintaining these devices on premise environment has a significant cost.
Read full review
ScreenShots