TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Threat Detection and Response vs. Picus Security

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Threat Detection and Response

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AA combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation.N/A

    Picus Security

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/APicus Security, headquartered in San Francisco, offers Continuous Security Validation and Mitigation as the most proactive approach to ensure cyber-resilience. The Picus Platform measures the effectiveness of defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments, providing the insight required to build the right security strategy to better manage complex operations.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Picus Security
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    60%
    Would buy again
    3 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of OpenText Threat Detection and Response and Picus Security
    Feature
    OpenText Threat Detection and Response
    5.5
    4 Ratings
    36% below category average
    Picus Security
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized event and log data collection8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Correlation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces5.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data integration/API management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Threat Detection and ResponsePicus Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    In the current lot of hundreds of SIEM solutions out there in the market, ArcSight ESM is fairly less expensive with strong fundamentals in place. The log ingestion, correlation are very well performing and totally worth ROI. However, the tool has lost its way when it comes to staying abreast with current feature curve of SIEM technology and the evolution has not been done by MicroFocus. Search times are high and there is no major plug-in that has been introduced as part of the product life cycle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    If you want to analyze the full path focusing on the signatures it’s the best product in the market. If you want to test phishing, data exfiltration/DLP, DNS I don’t recommend Picus. Scenario based attacks also lacking. However Picus support is awesome and I like the development team. When we open a case, they’ll always return with the right answer
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Integration with smart logger and ESM to create rules and easy management of the same.
    • Easy integration with all end point security management tool(IPS/IDS, Firewall, Anti-Virus) and their consolidated output at a single place to effectively rectifying true and false positives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    • It has thousands of signatures and up-to-date attack vectors (It's the largest set in the market)
    • Attack vectors are mapped with existing vendors like Checkpoint and Mcafee, where you don't spend time finding out which cve mapped to which protection
    • Ability to focus/highlght solely new threats, it's superb for 0days and up-to-date protections. As there are always timing issue between updates and apply the updates on the products.
    • Blocked vs not blocked ratios on the dashboard with drill down menu specifiying the set of protections or signatures on the defensive measures
    • Already mapped mitre att&ck framework on the dasboard. SOC and analyst team using the Mitre framework.
    • Detection analytics enhance the analytics capabilities with pinpoint accuracy where to focus and how to prevent
    • Timeline and scheduled reports from the dashboard in flexible format
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • It is slow comparing to any other SIEM Tool.
    • We have to create filter for each alerts need some custom filter .
    • Here we dont have any single tab for see all the alerts .also need some attractive features for dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    • Visualization of network and the products
    • Complex/Scenario based attacks
    • Phishing tests
    • DNS and Data exfiltration attacks
    • Automatic action through the apis for the products on the path
    • Strategical and tactical reports for Cisos
    • Automatic SOAR entegration with already builtin playbooks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    Overall, it is a good investment in order for an organization to stay compliant and stay secure from all the wild things happening. It is definitely a cost effective tool with some good features including correlation, log storage, reporting and dashboards. If a customer is looking for advanced set of features, then I would highly not recommend this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    I personally haven't reached the support team, however, the engineers never complained about the Arcsight support team. We had some issues with the tool in the past but every time we reached the support, all issues were resolved in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Multiple platforms are already supported by Arcsight. Support is good. Scripts can be used to get data from multiple threat intel sources & the same can be used in correlation rules to detect any suspicious activity. Reporting features are good & you can check any backdated information within new clicks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    We use other vendors Verodin, AttackIQ, SafeBreach, Cymulate etc. All of them have their advantages and disadvantages. Please take a look at TrustRadius reviews of each product. I don’t want to go head to head for each product in this
    review. I select Picus because it's local startup company in our region. I like their support and engineering team. Support is marvelous. Product is giving what we expected from the product. Price is adequate. Reporting and dashboard is superb.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Logger helps us to decrease incident response times.
    • It also decreased our project times with the man/day calculations. Before this solution, it may take up to 10 men/days to do something. After this, it becomes nearly half of the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Picus Security
    • With Picus we have the tangible KPIs for the security
    • Detetcion and Prevention rates for the latest attacks are significantly increased
    • We work with many security vendors. We use picus scores and share specific outputs with the company in case of decreasing score rates where the development and product team analyzes their updates or product engines to increase the rates.
    • It helps our strategic plans where to focus and invest for the following years and planning/prioritizing the security budgets to specific highlighted areas
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots