ORNA vs. Rapid7 InsightConnect

Where Rapid7 InsightConnect excels is in environments needing the whole suite of virus protection and monitoring. In our environment we use it to make sure we have visibility over all endpoints, servers, hosts, and clusters to make sure that there are no vulnerabilities being left unattended too. It is also best in large environments. Since there are many endpoints, the automation from Rapid7 helps manage them all in an efficient manner.

Incentivized

• The most significant difference is that we no longer have to examine endpoints and devices separately.
• The cost.
• The impact on the safety and efficiency of our business.

Incentivized

• It would be great if Rapid7 InsightConnect could be configured based on pre determined specifications when installing the agent.
• We've noticed that at times, there are certain network parameters needed in order for Rapid7 to collect and report data efficiently.
• Sometimes there are issues with the discovery scan in Rapid7 making it hard to configure in the beginning.

Incentivized

It's incredibly easy to set up, to use, to detect threats. It's easy to change, tweek and very quick to resolve all issues

Incentivized

Palo Alto was slightly cheaper, but more complex and would need the training to be effective. Splunk was comparative from a price standpoint, but the automation features of Rapid7 InsightConnect outweighed those of Splunk SOAR. Honestly, all of these are great choices, but for our environment, it made more sense to go with Rapid7.

Incentivized

• The automation and integration we set up in the dev cycle helped us provide evidence in audits
• The automation and integration we set up in the dev cycle helped us fix vulns in our software prior to implementation thus increasing our security
• Automations save massive time and headache's between infosec and devs

Incentivized