OSlash vs. TinyURL

Its shortcut feature of pasting the link is so good that the user doesn't need to go back to the browser and copy the url. Also, I like that it gives the name directly to internal url, that makes me route to that url faster just by clicking on save OSlash link for that url.

Since Tiny URL is able to be customized to a certain extent, we are able to take a long link to our website or landing page and create a much shorter version to add into social and digital campaigns where characters are limited and space is needed analytically and visually

Incentivized

• Creates a more user friendly link
• Help Google find our pages better
• SEO value

Incentivized

• Shortest link possible
• Lets you still customize the link/message
• Links don't expire

Incentivized

• Need to add some more features like saving data of any page if I lose over any page from the middle, it will make it different from browser bookmark functionality.
• Original links to be pasted when I use the link of my OSlash on pasting so that the opponent user gets the things, else he/she needs to go to that page first for getting info.

• Access to analytics would be great
• Creating a login for a business account
• availability to redirect link if needed

Incentivized

This would be good for content landing pages if we don't have the native capability, like /catalog or /contest or something. For better structuring the manual process of updating URLs, and for consolidating all in one place, easily accessible to all teams.

Incentivized

• Performance enhancement as no need to search for remembers as OSlash does it for us
• Cost effective

• can reach in different ways where long url cannot
• ability to use on social without clogging space
• easier to use, easier to spend

Incentivized