Panda Patch Management vs. Tenable Security Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Panda Patch Management
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security provides Panda Patch Management, a patching and vulnerability management solution.N/A
Tenable Security Center
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
Pricing
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Considered Both Products
Panda Patch Management
Chose Panda Patch Management
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory …
Tenable Security Center
Chose Tenable Security Center
Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's.
Chose Tenable Security Center
Tenable.sc can be installed so easily within an hour or so and it has user-friendly GUI with inbuilt industry-based customizable reports i.e. HIPAA, GDPR, ISO standards, etc. It also includes a configurable workflow engine that helps to speed up response and remediation, reduce …
Chose Tenable Security Center
My organization is strictly prohibited from using cloud services. Tenable.sc offers cloud service but we needed on-premises services. Therefore, Tenable.io was eliminated by Tenable.sc.
Chose Tenable Security Center
We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud …
Chose Tenable Security Center
We selected Tenable because is one of the best solution at the moment. Tenable is a powerful tool that we use for validation of our patching methodology. This is very helpful if you are only patching what the vendor deems as critical and then with this external validation you …
Features
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Panda Patch Management
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Tenable Security Center
9.6
Ratings
18% above category average
Network Analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification2.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Panda Patch Management
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
Tenable Security Center
9.6
Ratings
16% above category average
IT Asset Realization6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Authentication9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Web Scanning10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Panda Patch ManagementTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
Perfect for medium-to-large enterprises where endpoint management becomes complex, the tool helps maintain security and monitor issues detected on workstations and/or threats via the web, USB, etc. I do not recommend this tool for small businesses, however, due to its high annual licensing cost—an aspect of the product that could stand to be improved.
Read full review
Tenable.sc is best suited for those organizations who are not very comfortable with Cloud and want an on-premises solution. If any organization has to follow some guidelines that no data should go to the cloud, in this case, Tenable.sc is a perfect fit as it's installed in the infra Datacenter and no data goes to Cloud. Tenable.sc won't be appropriate for those who have their infra setup on cloud.
Read full review
Pros
  • Control of removable devices, Bluetooth, and others.
  • Web access control.
  • Real-time threat detection.
Read full review
  • Vulnerability management from one place
  • Maximum endpoint visibility
  • Easy to set up and plan the structure
  • Support desk quickly responses
  • Well-prepared documentation
  • Broad scanning type
  • Supports various compliance standards
  • User groups allows coordination between teams
Read full review
Cons
  • Schedule patch application times.
  • Manage Windows updates.
  • Manage computer drivers, allowing for their removal.
Read full review
  • Tenable could make it easier to report on missing reg key.
  • Tenable can also make it easier to report on os level patches vs application patches.
Read full review
Usability
I believe the tool could be improved by adding additional features—particularly for operating system update management, such as the ability to create management groups—thereby centralizing all patch management in a single console and enhancing agility and security for workstations. It could also include a dashboard to notify users of new patches, centralize news about critical software patches, and so on.
Read full review
based on product capabilities and usage
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory usage associated with Trend on desktops.
Read full review
Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Avoid/reduce production stoppages due to station unavailability.
  • Control internal web access, improving internet usage management.
  • By anticipating shutdowns caused by threats, you are indirectly contributing to the company's ROI.
Read full review
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies
  • Improve compliance & risk management
  • Cost management
  • Solid vulnerability scanner
  • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
Read full review
ScreenShots