PDFEscape vs. Sejda

This editor is not made for reference designing pdfs, but for simple editing, it is more than efficient. Many PDF editors require a subscription for something as basic as typing a name or date. PDFEscape is perfect for this and can be done online without any software download.

Incentivized

If all that you need is a simple read function for pdf documents, Sejda does fine. If you want to be able to highlight items or convert the pdf document into a Word document for editing and revisions, this tool does not provide strong functionality.

Incentivized

• It is free with little to no limits.
• Has plenty of tools for editing.
• The text tool is customizable for font and size.

Incentivized

• PDF reader
• Zoom and scan functions
• Key word search

Incentivized

• The upload document function often gives an error message at first upload and you have to go back to the main page to upload again.
• A mimic font and text size tool would be of benefit.
• The whiteout tool is a white box and not a pen, which could be easier.

Incentivized

• Our version has no editing or markup capability
• Does not do a robust job of converting pdf to Word
• Search is not always reliable or accurate

Incentivized

PDFEscape is in a league of its own with price and ease of use. Competitors have not met the same criteria and I constantly go back to PDFEscape.

Incentivized

Adobe has more functionality, but there have been some concerns about ongoing support. Sejda was seen as a viable alternative for the majority of our users, who only need to read pdf documents, and not do any revisions or markups.

Incentivized

• PDFEscape has saved money for the organization since it is free.
• Timesaver
• Ease of use (no training)

Incentivized

• Filled the gap from our prior pdf product
• Slightly less capital investment, to my understanding
• Users have not been happy with the reduced functionality

Incentivized