PhantomBuster vs. Stitch from Talend

It is very useful for data extraction from different sources and automation like Linkedin invitation My databases would not have the quality they have right now if I did not use Phantombuster It is not very useful for Mails Extractions, Phantombuster extraction tools does not give you goods mailing format

Incentivized

Stitch is very cheap and useful for small to medium size companies to ingest data from common apis/platforms in a quick and cheap way.

Incentivized

• Data Extraction
• Automation
• Integration with Google Sheets
• A lot of features

Incentivized

• Easy integration with many sources
• Extensible
• Not as expensive as fivetran

Incentivized

• Mailing Extractor
• Excel connection
• Video tutorial of features

Incentivized

• Stitch is not good at replicating document stores like MongoDB to relational databases. To be fair, this is a difficult task. Stitch flattens the objects, but the result is unwieldy.
• Stitch cannot replicate the same source to multiple sinks, which is inconvenient if you want to replicate some of a datastore's tables to Redshift and others to Redshift Spectrum, for instance.

Incentivized

I don't really have the opportunity to test another Data Extraction tool like Phantombuster. When I started my job they already have bought this tool so I learned how to use it and honestly I do not have any need to change it. I think Phantombuster is the best for this

Incentivized

Stitch is much cheaper and probably simpler than tools like Fivetran. Stitch is for simpler projects and used alongside traditional ETL and writing ones own code into APIs. Fivetran is more of a overarching tool but also more expensive

Incentivized

• More Leads
• Better leads quality
• Fast Communication

Incentivized

• Freed up data engineers to work on transformations
• Bought us some time to migrate from our ETL tool

Incentivized