Playwright vs. Tricentis Testim Salesforce

Playwright is works pretty well for automating the critical user paths of any web application, ensuring that core functionalities are constantly tested and catching issues before they reach QA, particularly through its seamless integration into our CI/CD (in our case, using GithHub); however, it is less appropriate for mobile testing since it doesn't support mobile applications. Testers still needs to learn another framework to do this.

Incentivized

My organization heavily customizes Salesforce to align it with specific business processes, adding custom fields, workflows, and triggers. With each Salesforce release or customization update, we need to ensure that existing functionalities and customizations remain intact.Tricentis Test Automation for Salesforce excels in this scenario. Its ability to create and execute comprehensive regression test suites efficiently ensures that customizations don't introduce unexpected issues or regressions. We can automate the validation of custom workflows, triggers, and data integrity, saving time and reducing the risk of errors.

Incentivized

• automation
• integrations
• support
• community
• features
• easy to use
• documentation

Incentivized

• Creation of Salesforce objects automatically
• AI-powered Smart locators
• Creation of test cases and modification is so easy compare to any other tool

• bigger adoption
• mobile testing

Incentivized

• The available documentation and learning resources are not extensive enough.
• The tool lacks sufficient customization options for creating and managing test cases.
• Limited integration with other tools and platforms.

Incentivized

We will renew but hope they improve their mobile experience.

Incentivized

It makes automating complex user interactions easier, fits right into our CI/CD for continuous testing, and works great across different browsers. The Documentation is a plus, you don't really need to search a lot to understand and find what you need for the coding. The community is small but very helpful, which makes it a breeze to use and a must-have for keeping our software in top shape.

Incentivized

Very good tool, first of this kind so no element to compare but still very good tool. It allows us to gain a lot of time and to be very deep in the testing phases

Incentivized

We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow.

Incentivized

We selected Tricentis Test Automation due to it's ease of use. It was the pricier option out of the competitve pool, however, it was important for us to have a scalable solution that integrated with all of our technologies and platforms. It was the most user-friendly tool and took the least amount of time to onboard individuals.

Incentivized

• Reduce of cost of manual testers
• Reduce of released bugs
• Reduce of costs of developer time
• Increase QA Coverage

Incentivized

• Improved productivity of QA team a lot
• Efficiency of test automation scripts gone up
• Automating test cases is so easy and reduced lot of efforts