Proofpoint Web Security vs. SUSE Security

I think [Proofpoint Meta (formerly Meta Networks)] is a pretty robust VPN solution that would be good for most [organizations].

Incentivized

SUSE NeuVector is exceptional when you want to make your Kubernetes cluster secure. You can limit network connections, scan containers, container registries and Kubernetes nodes for vulnerable software, forbid running specific commands on certain or all containers. You can enable security for individual containers - when SUSE NeuVector has learned container specifics. That's why you can deploy SUSE NeuVector on production Kubernetes clusters where you are already running conteiners - it will not break anything.

• Stable VPN - 99.999 uptime
• Fast connection - have POP all around the world
• Enhanced security - flexible user policy.

Incentivized

• Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
• Denies command execution in containers
• Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers

• Faster SSL vpn would be nice.

Incentivized

• I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.

Meta was agile and gave us the product we were looking for. the other vendors were lacking a lot of features or had a difficult deployment.

Incentivized

SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.

• Positive - it let the company WFH in a pretty decent manner so no [work] hours were lost.

Incentivized

• We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
• Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.