TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

QA Sphere vs. TestRail

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

QA Sphere

TestRail

34 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    QA Sphere

    		N/AN/AQA Sphere is a cloud-based Test Management system for planning, organizing, executing, and reporting on manual and exploratory software tests. The platform centralizes test cases, test runs, results, requirements, and linked defects. Key Capabilities Test case management: Teams can organize test cases by folder, tag, priority, and project. Parameterized cases support multiple data variations without duplicating the test steps. Test suites can be imported and…

    $12

    per month per user

    TestRail

    Score8.6 out of 10
    		N/ATestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.

    $35

    per month billed annually

    Pricing
    QA SphereTestRail
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    Standard
    $12
    per month per user
    Business
    $24
    per month per user
    Professional Cloud
    $35
    per month billed annually per user
    Professional Cloud
    $38
    per month per user
    Enterprise Cloud
    $71
    per month billed annually per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    QA SphereTestRail
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsQA Sphere is priced per user per month. The Free plan covers up to 3 users with 1 GB of attachment storage, full API and integration access, and a capped allowance of AI generations. Standard is $12 per user per month and adds unlimited projects, 20 GB of attachment storage, Google SSO, unlimited free read-only viewer seats for stakeholders, and AI test case generation and bug reporting without credit metering. Business is $24 per user per month for teams needing higher limits and additional administrative controls. Custom enterprise terms are available, and a 30-day trial requires no credit card.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    QA SphereTestRail
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of QA Sphere and TestRail
    Feature
    QA Sphere
    -
    Ratings
    TestRail
    7.5
    3 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    User Ratings
    QA SphereTestRail
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    QA SphereTestRail
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
    Incentivized
    Binoy Shah
    Software Integration Tester
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    • Managing test plans and test cases
    • Generation of test results
    • Modularised way of storing tests
    Incentivized
    Alfiya Mukadam
    Software Engineer
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    • Outstanding user bugs
    • UI is clunky
    • Things are not where you think they would be
    Incentivized
    Lisa Krol
    Quality Assurance Engineer
    Read full review
    Usability
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
    Incentivized
    Alfiya Mukadam
    Software Engineer
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
    Incentivized
    Binoy Shah
    Software Integration Tester
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hypersequent DMCC
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
    • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
    • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
    Incentivized
    Lisa Krol
    Quality Assurance Engineer
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    QA Sphere Screenshots

    Screenshot of QA Sphere project main pageScreenshot of Test Run in progressScreenshot of Test run status update and commentingScreenshot of Reports built for the project