QA Wolf provides managed QA assurance and testing services for startups and other industries. QA Wolf is a hybrid platform and service that helps software teams ship better software faster by taking QA completely off their plate.
N/A
Testlio
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Testlio’s fully managed crowdsourced testing platform integrates expert, on-demand testers directly into the release process. It helps developers to ship faster and more confidently with global coverage across 600,000+ devices, 800+ payment methods, 150+ countries, and 100+ languages.
QA Wolf is great if you want to automate the building and managing of end-to-end regression style tests. They would not be great for new feature buildouts where the tests need to be done very quickly to ship a feature or if the feature is changing rapidly, as there is at least a couple day lag to when test cases get built out. QA Wolf does not do any manual testing so that is not a good use case for the platform.
Testlio is well-suited to work with us due to its flexibility and scalability, which align perfectly with the dynamic needs of a growing technology firm. Testlio's global network of professional testers provides the breadth and depth of testing expertise necessary to cover the array of technologies and platforms used by us. Additionally, this combination of Testlio's flexible testing solutions and our need for cost-effective, comprehensive QA support makes Testlio an ideal partner for ensuring a high standard of software quality.
Our situation is somewhat unique such that we have internal QA members liaising with our QA Wolf partners. This has been ideal for communicating and effectively identifying test coverage needs. So, unfortunately for this question, we have not experienced any issues needing improvement in our relationship with QA Wolf.
It is easy to use from day 1. I was actually able to login, and given the simplicity of use, I was creating my own tests within the first 10 minutes. I didn't have much confidence at first on my skill to be able to create tests but the interface made it super easy. We were able to leverage QA Wolf system within the same day.
We chose QA Wolf for the quality of the tests that they write, their flexibility, outstanding customer support, workflow integrations, excellent infrastructure, and competitive pricing. We were not happy with the quality of the tests we were getting with ProdPerfect. We were going to evaluate MuukTest once our proof of concept with QA Wolf was completed, but we were already convinced we had what we wanted, and going with a less capable infrastructure wasn't worth the cost savings.
When comparing Testlio against other vendors, several key factors set it apart and made it the preferred choice for us. Testlio's singular focus on testing services we thought would include a depth of expertise and quality that generalist dev shops can't match. Secondly, Testlio's flexible engagement models stood out significantly. Unlike other vendors that might offer more rigid, one-size-fits-all solutions, Testlio provides customizable testing services that can be scaled up or down based on project needs.
QA Wolf saves us from having to build a QA automation team. We implemented QA Wolf early so our team never needed to build a motion around automated regression testing outside of QA Wolf.
QA Wolf is capable enough to figure out how our product works without much guidance, so when delivering test cases, we're able to send a video of the behavior without much training, and they're able to build the test cases with very little additional guidance.
