What users are saying about
4 Ratings
4 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.8 out of 101

Likelihood to Recommend

Qubole

I find Qubole is well suited for getting started analyzing data in the cloud without being locked in to a specific cloud vendor's tooling other than the underlying filesystem. Since the data itself is not isolated to any Qubole cluster, it can be easily be collected back into a cloud-vendor's specific tools for further analysis, therefore I find it complementary to any offerings such as Amazon EMR or Google DataProc.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

NoSQL Databases

Qubole
8.3
Performance
Qubole
7.0
Availability
Qubole
6.0
Concurrency
Qubole
8.0
Security
Qubole
7.0
Scalability
Qubole
10.0
Data model flexibility
Qubole
10.0
Deployment model flexibility
Qubole
10.0

Pros

Qubole

  • From a UI perspective, I find Qubole's closest comparison to Cloudera's HUE; it provides a one-stop shop for all data browsing and querying needs.
  • Auto scaling groups and auto-terminating clusters provides cost savings for idle resources.
  • Qubole fits itself well into the open-source data science market by providing a choice of tools that aren't tied to a specific cloud vendor.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Cons

Qubole

  • Providing an open selection of all cloud provider instance types with no explanation as to their ideal use cases causes too much confusion for new users setting up a new cluster. For example, not everyone knows that Amazon's R or X-series models are memory optimized, while the C and M-series are for general computation.
  • I would like to see more ETL tools provided other than DistCP that allow one to move data between Hadoop Filesystems.
  • From the cluster administration side, onboarding of new users for large companies seems troublesome, especially when trying to create individual cluster per team within the company. Having the ability to debug and share code/queries between users of other teams / clusters should also be possible.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Qubole

Qubole 6.0
Based on 1 answer
Personally, I have no issues using Amazon EMR with Hue and Zeppelin, for example, for data science and exploratory analysis. The benefits to using Qubole are that it offers additional tooling that may not be available in other cloud providers without manual installation and also offers auto-terminating instances and scaling groups.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Qubole

Qubole was decided on by upper management rather than these competitive offerings. I find that Databricks has a better Spark offering compared to Qubole's Zeppelin notebooks.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Return on Investment

Qubole

  • We like to say that Qubole has allowed for "data democratization", meaning that each team is responsible for their own set of tooling and use cases rather than being limited by versions established by products such as Hortonworks HDP or Cloudera CDH
  • One negative impact is that users have over-provisioned clusters without realizing it, and end up paying for it. When setting up a new cluster, there are too many choices to pick from, and data scientists may not understand the instance types or hardware specs for the datasets they need to operate on.
Jordan Moore profile photo

Pricing Details

Qubole

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Add comparison