Robot Framework vs. CucumberStudio, from SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Robot Framework
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Robot Framework is a generic keyword-driven test automation and RPA framework for acceptance level testing and acceptance test-driven development (ATDD).N/A
CucumberStudio
Score 4.9 out of 10
N/A
CucumberStudio, now a SmartBear product since the 2019 acquisition, is a continuous testing platform replacing the former HipTest, supporting agile development with manual and automated code testing, reusable steps, feature history with living documentation, among other features.N/A
Pricing
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio, from SmartBear
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio, from SmartBear
Best Alternatives
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio, from SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio, from SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Robot FrameworkCucumberStudio, from SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
It suits for checking features of a simple web application or features that don't heavily rely on AJAX. You could create tests that check if application is running properly and raise alarm if required so someone can manually check for problems. However making big test sets to produce reliable results may prove to be difficult or impossible. Also running lots of test cases can take hours.
Read full review
SmartBear
HipTest is good and helpful to create and run functional regressions but it is more complicated to use this tool to create and run API testing scenarios (it does not mean it can not be done). This tool is definitively not appropriate for running performance testing scenarios.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Good integration with Jira
  • Includes integration with different tools for different porpuses
  • You can build your own framework to automate scenarios and make it work with Hiptest
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • UX is not too obvious and easy (like generating a data table in a scenario or including a scenario in a test run) but you can get used to it relatively easy by playing around with the options, also the documentation is helpful.
  • To get extra functionalities you have to pay for them separately.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
The tool includes a basic but complete documentation that can be very helpful to get started using the tool. The UX sometimes does not feel very easy to understand but after some use you can get familiar without reading the documentation. The webinars are not very useful for using the tool, I have seen a couple of them and they are actually focused on promoting their HipTest product to new users instead of being useful and educational for current users.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • It helps to have organization in our scenarios.
  • It helps to get regressions done faster than doing it manually
  • It helps to graphically see the progress and results of executions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CucumberStudio Screenshots

Screenshot of CucumberStudio empowers the whole team to read and refine executable specifications without needing technical tools. Business and technology teams can collaborate on acceptance criteria and bridge their gap.