TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SANsymphony

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ADataCore SANsymphony software-defined storage aims to deliver flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency in a HCI platform. Powered by a block-level storage virtualization technology, SANsymphony is designed to provide flexibility to control how data is stored, protected, and accessed. The vendor states users can ensure business continuity with just 2 nodes, easily scaling out to 64 nodes, and achieve productivity for performance-demanding workloads by improving I/O processing and reducing…N/A
    Pricing
    SANsymphony
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SANsymphony
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SANsymphony
    Considered Both Products
    DataCore Software
    Chose SANsymphony
    SANsymphony only requires two nodes to get started
    Incentivized
    Chose SANsymphony
    I actually have my VMware running on top of this. Datacore simply makes the data storage available to my vmware servers as needed.
    Incentivized
    Chose SANsymphony
    DataCore is far easier to manage as well as deal with when it comes to hardware (as DataCore works with any hardware). It also seems way more affordable.
    Incentivized
    Chose SANsymphony
    We reviewed DotHill, EMC, HP, Dell-Compliant, Left-Hand, NetApp and VMware's vSAN offerings and after reviewing costs, performance, and features, DataCore came out on top. We discovered that DataCore's solution allowed us to save about 50%, as compared to other SAN vendors but …
    Incentivized
    Chose SANsymphony
    Very proprietary and not sure if it's still around. Pricing was not an issue, just the vendor lock-in was an issue. Simple software layout and not too many hiccups for HP. SANsymphony was just as easy to use and you could grab any vendor, not just HP, to upgrade the system.
    Incentivized
    Chose SANsymphony
    Since it's running on Windows, it's very easy to understand and get ready to work. Simple concept, great UI, very straightforward.

    Since it's running on Windows, it will require more updates and patching than a Linux based Virtual SAN.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    SANsymphony
    Small Businesses
    StarWind Virtual SAN
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    StarWind Virtual SAN
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Storage Scale
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SANsymphony
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SANsymphony
    Likelihood to Recommend
    DataCore Software
    Now that you have virtualized your server's CPU and memory resources, you should look to do the same for your storage. Separation of hardware and software has many added benefits not only for CPUs and memory but for storage as well. Without this solution, we would not have been able to afford black-box type SANs at every location. This allowed us to virtualize over 90% of the server environment saving costs and power consumption/cooling and provides all the features costly black-box SANs, including true-HA (which most SAN vendors don't have). Migration from variant SAN storage and using mixed back-end storage solutions is as easier than ever before because the storage being virtualized.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    DataCore Software
    • Fast pools should go to your most used data, and not static files.
    • Redundancy is a must for all aspects of our IT jobs. Who wants to explain when there's no data?
    • Works on Windows server 2012/2016 much better. Solid stability.
    Read full review
    Cons
    DataCore Software
    • Our needs are very small when compared to what this product can do. We don't use all of what it is capable of doing. Honestly, I have no cons.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    DataCore Software
    I'm currently in the process of renewing my support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    DataCore Software
    In the 3 years I have been running this, I have contacted support around 4 or 5 times and that was for minor questions with exception of one time when I was performing an update on the system. And in that one time, they were very timely in assisting me with correcting the problem. Top notch customer support!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    DataCore Software
    DataCore is far easier to manage as well as deal with when it comes to hardware (as DataCore works with any hardware). It also seems way more affordable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    DataCore Software
    • More uptime - Typical SANs have redundant controllers, redundant power supply's and can make the drives redundant by leveraging RAID-0, 5, 6, and 10. The claim to be HA but they are not. That is because if I spay water all over them or catch the SAN on fire, the storage will go down. With DataCore's solution we have identical systems (maybe even at different datacenters connected with long-haul-fiber) including duplicate storage. So one side of the solution can totally be taken offline by water, fire, etc. and the other side will remain up providing true-HA storage. Because of this, we can upgrade the SANs during the day and still keep storage services running (zero-downtime).
    • Lower Costs - Ability to use 3rd party hardware which lowers the costs, not only for the initial investment but as storage capacity grows.
    • All the features one can want - High Availability, Thin Provisioning, Asynchronous and Synchronous mirroring/replication, snap-shotting, continues data protection, deduplication, storage reporting, trending with graphs, centralized console for easier management and many more.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots