TrustRadius

Sensagraph vs. Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Sensagraph
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Sensagraph is an agentless external security scanning platform that shows you your web applications the way an attacker sees them: from the public internet, with nothing to install and no code to change. Point Sensagraph at a domain, verify ownership once, and it maps any app's real attack surface across five focused capabilities: Web Application Vulnerability Detection (SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and the rest of the OWASP Top 10), Web Server Configuration Analysis,…
$19
per month
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vulcan Cyber was an exposure and vulnerability risk mitigation platform, acquired by Tenable in early 2025. The product is no longer available for sale, and functionality has been integrated into the Tenable One Exposure Management platform's vulnerability solution.N/A
Pricing
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Scout
$19
per month
Sentinel
$49
per month
Ops
$119
per month
Scout
$190
per year
Sentinel
$490
per year
Ops
$1,190
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSensagraph is priced as a simple, self-serve subscription with no setup fees, no long procurement cycle, and no mandatory sales call to get started. A free plan includes 1 full external scan per month, so you can evaluate the product on your own domain before paying anything. Paid plans are built to scale with how much you scan and how many domains you monitor, which makes the product a good fit for a range of buyers: solo developers securing a single site, SaaS teams watching their production environment, and agencies managing many client domains from one account. There are no agents to license per host and no per-endpoint charges, so pricing stays predictable as your footprint grows. Every plan includes the same core scanning engine and the client-ready PDF report, so you are choosing based on scan volume and domain coverage, not being locked out of key security features at lower tiers.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Sensagraph

No answer on this topic

Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Acronis Cyber Protect
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
I wasn't here at the time when the company compared different vulnerability management platforms so I'm not sure on the reasoning and difference between the 2. It could be that the team went through different choices and found Vulcan to be the best fit. It's hard for me to say …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
My role is not in charge of selecting more services or products like Vulcan. I just use them as part of my daily responsibilities. Maybe other roles can give more feedback about this.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Nucleus Security was missing some connectors and was more focused on risk prioritization than ticketing automation.

Seemplicity had a different billing method that may have ended up being more expensive. Also a younger app.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Vulcan Cyber has a more mature platform catered for enterprise customers compared to Nucleus. The very close support and attention to detail of the Vulcan sales and technical team also helped in answering any possible question we had about the platform or take note of our …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
The competitors were either more complex to implement or higher cost for similar capabilities.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Vulcan was easier to implement with our existing Security environment. The UX and UI were more intuitive and user-friendly. While SOAR is a super solid product, for our business Vulcan made more sense. It was more of a natural fit for a rapidly-expanding company in a …
Features
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Sensagraph
-
Ratings
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.9
Ratings
2% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Sensagraph
-
Ratings
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.3
Ratings
12% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SensagraphVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We use Vulcan Cyber to help with the technical debt accrued over time with systems that were not maintained as well as they should be. To combat this, we use the campaign feature to keep a running tab on every system to ensure it is brought up to standards and maintained.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • The user interface makes it very easy to use.
  • It provides a clear picture and helps us to make decisions.
  • It offers automation and risk visibility.
MC
Michael Cerruti
Data Analyst
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Deduping of assets could be better.
  • The weighting of vulnerabilities is hard to describe to non technical executives.
  • The Business Groups and Tagging needs improvement. Or at least allow tags to be removed if not needed. Now they are static from the API feed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Vulcan was easier to implement with our existing Security environment. The UX and UI were more intuitive and user-friendly. While SOAR is a super solid product, for our business Vulcan made more sense. It was more of a natural fit for a rapidly-expanding company in a hyper-growth phase using Edge technology.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Allows much better prioritizing of which assets are most vulnerable
  • Allow a better understanding of what assets are actually under real threat vs. what is assumed to be vulnerable, but the real world fact is the system would be hard to reach internally, so it's not as vulnerable.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

Sensagraph Screenshots

Screenshot of Scan Result ScreenScreenshot of Domain Verification Screen