Snyk vs. Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

Snyk

Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Snyk	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	Snyk’s Developer Security Platform automatically integrates with a developer’s workflow and helps security teams to collaborate with their development teams. It boasts a developer-first approach that ensures organizations can secure all of the critical components of their applications from code to cloud, driving developer productivity, revenue growth, customer satisfaction, cost savings and an improved security posture. The vendor states Snyk is used by 1,200 customers worldwide today, including…	$0
Synopsys Seeker	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Synopsys Seeker is presented by the vendor as an IAST solution with active verification and sensitive-data tracking for web-based applications, which the vendor states is more accurate than traditional DAST solutions.	N/A

Pricing

Snyk

Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

Editions & Modules

Free: $0
Team (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code): $23
per month per user
Business (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code): $42
per month per user
Team (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code): $98
per month per user
Business (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code): $178
per month per user
Enterprise: Contact Sales

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Snyk	Synopsys Seeker
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

Pricing is dependent on the number of developers selected, the number of products selected, and the payment term selected. Please visit the Snyk plans page for an interactive pricing calculator.

Contact the Synopsys Software Integrity Group (SIG) Sales team at https://www.synopsys.com/software-integrity/contact-sales.html for more detailed pricing information.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Snyk	Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Considered Both Products	Snyk Verified User Anonymous Chose Snyk We evaluated different solutions to build Application Security SAST capabilities and foster a security first (Shift Left) culture mindset for development engineering teams. Snyk was the best fit into our picture and has all the solutions in a single platform, Snyk Enterprise … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Snyk Developer-Centric Design Incentivized Helpful? AC Alex Campos Head of Engineering Chose Snyk I use both as they combine together well. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Snyk Unfortunately, neither cover all of the use cases that we would like so we need to use both but they are both excellent tools as part of our vulnerability management. We find that Snyk helps us better with improving our MTTR of identified vulnerabilities when compared to … Incentivized Helpful? MS Manas Singh IT Architect Chose Snyk Better Vulnerability research and GUI and usability Incentivized Helpful?	Synopsys Seeker No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Snyk	Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Veracode Score 8.6 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises	Veracode Score 8.6 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Snyk	Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Snyk	Seeker Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Likelihood to Recommend	1) SAST Code Scan 2) Infra Code Scan 3) Docker Image Scan 4) SAS solution and provides good integration with various SCMS Incentivized MS Manas Singh IT Architect Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Integration in CI/CD pipeline. Periodic reporting is also an option. Clear separation of issues/categories. Insightful reasoning for issue and suggested solutions. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Setting up is complex and when not do no properly provides too many false positives. We use another tool in parallel because it does not cover all of our languages especially for older code that is in mixed languages. Integrating it with bitbucket was not straight forward. Incentivized AC Alex Campos Head of Engineering Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity. Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Developer-Centric Design Snyk integrates seamlessly into the dev workflow (IDEs, Git, CI/CD). Tools like Veracode/Fortify are security team-centric, with less developer engagement. Unlike WhiteSource or Sonatype, Snyk has a faster learning curve and actionable fixes. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	The API is extensive enough for many integration options. API keys are rotated on a non-preferred time schedule. There's no way to configure this. We had a great experience with the support team and success managers while setting up the product and onboarding projects into the tool Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Synopsys Seeker Screenshots