TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Snyk

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ASnyk’s Developer Security Platform automatically integrates with a developer’s workflow and helps security teams to collaborate with their development teams. It boasts a developer-first approach that ensures organizations can secure all of the critical components of their applications from code to cloud, driving developer productivity, revenue growth, customer satisfaction, cost savings and an improved security posture. The vendor states Snyk is used by 1,200 customers worldwide today, including…

    $0

    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ATrellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A

    Veracode

    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
    Pricing
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    Team (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
    $23
    per month per user
    Business (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
    $42
    per month per user
    Team (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
    $98
    per month per user
    Business (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
    $178
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPricing is dependent on the number of developers selected, the number of products selected, and the payment term selected. Please visit the Snyk plans page for an interactive pricing calculator.—Developer pricing options available
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Considered Multiple Products
    Snyk
    Chose Snyk
    Developer-Centric Design
    Incentivized
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answer on this topic
    Veracode
    Chose Veracode
    I found SonarQube to have some decent data for code quality checks but it underperformed for code security.

    Snyk is a decent product and strong competitor to Veracode for SCA. Snyk's SAST offering is not as good as Veracode and does not support as many languages.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Snyk and WhiteSource have fewer features. WhiteSource UI is as bad as Veracode; Snyk is integrated better in GitHub but provides decent results only for JavaScript. The best one for reporting and quality of results across languages is Meterian, which does not appear in this …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Snyk has a much better and more intuitive UI, but as far as I know does not provide DAST and SAST like Veracode does. When it comes to SCA, you might be better off going with Snyk.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Why you selected Veracode?
    Stack coverage.
    Integration into our pipeline and ticketing tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode is much cheaper and does more: SAST, SCA, DAST, and now PEN as a service.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    The maturity of the Veracode and the continuous improvements in its products it's one of the principal characteristics of chosee it, Veracode it's a SaaS platform and was born in the cloud, so this is a great option for our clients to be quick to implement also the easy of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Better all-round with the right balance for features vs cost.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    131 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    93 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    135 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    79 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    75%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    104 Answers
    Features
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Snyk and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator and Veracode
    Feature
    Snyk
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.6
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Veracode
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Snyk and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator and Veracode
    Feature
    Snyk
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    32% below category average
    Veracode
    -
    Ratings
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Checkmarx
    Score7.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (6 ratings)
    7.0
    (14 ratings)
    8.3
    (145 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.2
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (29 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.7
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    7.6
    (67 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SnykTrellix ePolicy OrchestratorVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Snyk
    Scenarios Where Snyk Is Well-Suited CI/CD Pipeline Integration (Node.js, Python, etc.) Container Security Open Source License Compliance Infrastructure as Code (IaC) SecurityScenarios Where Snyk May Be Less Appropriate Scanning Proprietary or Custom Code for Unknown Vulnerabilities Complex Monorepos with Custom Build Tools Organizations Requiring Custom Security Rules Advanced Security Teams Needing Correlation and Deep Triage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    [McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode helped us our team's developers in saving time significantly. For instance, if I take a library and assume it's going to work until it reaches QA or UAT, where we find out there's a vulnerability, that can require extensive effort for code refactoring or redesigning; Veracode helps prevent that before the pull request is merged.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Snyk
    • Helps in dependency management
    • SAST - Static Application Security Testing
    • Infra Code Scan ( Terraform , Cloud Formation , Docker image scan)
    • OSSG
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
    • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
    • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
    • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • It is good at recommending fixing issues with third-party dependencies used in application code with detailed version information and knowing which version fixes what.
    • It has a very nice interface for triaging flaws. One can sort the vulnerabilities found in code from Very Likely to be exploited to least likely to be exploited.
    • There is a collections feature that allows us to group together groups of application profiles belonging to the same suite of applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Snyk
    • The tool itself has many capabilities but using them operationally within the platform on a day to day basis for managing vulnerabilities is not a good experience.
    • Our company was in desparate need of a tool to help us manage vulnerabilities so we could achieve a SOC 2 assurance report without findings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
    • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
    • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
    • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
    • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Snyk
    Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity.


    Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    - Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    Veracode has always been up and available to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Snyk
    Unfortunately, neither cover all of the use cases that we would like so we need to use both but they are both excellent tools as part of our vulnerability management. We find that Snyk helps us better with improving our MTTR of identified vulnerabilities when compared to inspector but that may be more based on how we have implemented both tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    No idea
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Snyk
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    It meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Snyk
    • Increased developer experience
    • Better productivity due to shift left as Vulnerabilities are caught earlier in the SDLC process
    • Improved Vulnerability Management
    • Common dashboard for various stages in CI/CD
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
    • Keep your network environment up and running.
    • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
    • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
    • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Positive: Scanning all our applications on Veracode provides us an overview of our cyber security posture for the organization as a whole.
    • Positive: Performing the SAST, SCA and DAST scanning for all the applications at the early stages of the SDLC helps us identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities early, reducing the risk of data breaches and cyber-attacks.
    • Negative: Sometimes Veracode SAST scanner closed and reopens some findings, leading to reliability issues on the scanner itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Veracode Screenshots

    Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github