TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SoftEther VPN

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    WireGuard

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AWireGuard is presented as a simple yet fast and modern VPN that utilizes cryptography. It aims to be faster, simpler, leaner, and more useful than IPsec, and more performant than OpenVPN. WireGuard is designed as a general purpose VPN for running on embedded interfaces and super computers alike, fit for many different circumstances. Initially released for the Linux kernel, it is now cross-platform (Windows, macOS, BSD, iOS, Android).

    $0

    Pricing
    SoftEther VPNWireGuard
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SoftEther VPNWireGuard
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    SoftEther VPNWireGuard
    Virtual Private Network
    Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of SoftEther VPN and WireGuard
    Feature
    SoftEther VPN
    9.9
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    WireGuard
    -
    Ratings
    AES 256-bit Encryption10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Kill Switch10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Platform Support10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Split Tunneling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    IP Address Masking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    No-Logs Policy10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Server Locations10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Wi-Fi Protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Simultaneous Connections10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Support Services9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    SoftEther VPNWireGuard
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SoftEther VPNWireGuard
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SoftEther Project
    SoftEther VPN works easily, and extremely well through Azure, client-to-server, and in Layer 3 bridge mode between offices but it is not so easy to use from mobile devices, although we have had success, albeit with difficulty in the configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Perfect for low spec hardware, it runs perfectly well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SoftEther Project
    • It just works—I have never had a single call from a client or end-user complaining that their VPN wasn't working.
    • It can be configured to be super easy for end-users to use—Nearly transparent to them, in fact.
    • It is very lightweight on devices and works extremely fast. So fast, in fact, that about the only issue I ever have with SoftEther VPN are related to users sometimes forgetting they are working remotely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Perfomance
    • Security
    • Ease of use
    • Reliability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SoftEther Project
    • We have has some issues where their default port won't connect through an AT&T wireless AP, but creating an exception for it on the AP or changing the port always gets it working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Some kind of access control, although I know this is out of scope of the tool
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SoftEther Project
    I had experienced several reliability issues soon after Pertino VPN-as-a-Service was acquired by Cradlepoint where the service would go down for a supposed update but would be down for long periods. And that was just one of several issues that caused me grief. I started looking around for a suitable replacement and came across SoftEther VPN, a project by the University of Tsukuba, Japan, quite by accident. I fell in love with its ease of implementation, low device cost, ease of Admin control, and ease of use for end-users, in addition to its near-zero downtime reliability, and the fact that I have total control over its operation and maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    OpenVPN its a well known solution but it pales compared to WireGuard in terms of perfomance, speed and easey implementation.
    Also it required less resources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SoftEther Project
    • I went from a Pertino/Cradlepoint VPN-as-a-Service requiring no hardware to a SoftEther VPN Client/Server configuration and that required the purchase of a tiny server to run SEVPN. It could have been a Linux box or Windows and I chose Windows, so there was a minimal cost for the Windows 10 device but it eliminated the monthly service cost and has historically been far more reliable.
    • We went from about $12/user/month on Cradlepoint perimeter81 to $0/user/month after about a $500 investment in hardware, so just one of my clients has been saving $300/month after the initial $500 for the "Server" device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Reliability
    • Resilience
    • Peace of mind
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots