Sophos Central Device Encryption vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sophos Central Device Encryption | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Sophos Central Device Encryption (formerly SafeGuard) is a full disk encryption solution, based on the technology acquired with Utimaco by Sophos in 2008. It provides full disk encryption for Windows and macOS, and enables users to confidentially share sensitive files. A password protected HTML wrapper ensures only recipients with the correct password can access a document. | N/A |
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions. | N/A |
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 75% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Symantec Encryption Score9.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Trellix Complete Data Protection Score8.7 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.4 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 8.2 |
| Sophos Central Device Encryption | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

