SUSE Security vs. Tenable Security Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SUSE Security
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SUSE® Security (formerly NeuVector) provides an end-to-end container security platform. This includes end-to-end vulnerability scanning and complete run-time protection for containers, pods and hosts.
$0
Tenable Security Center
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
Pricing
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Features
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
SUSE Security
-
Ratings
Tenable Security Center
9.6
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
SUSE Security
-
Ratings
Tenable Security Center
9.6
1 Ratings
15% above category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(2 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
SUSE SecurityTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
SUSE
SUSE NeuVector is exceptional when you want to make your Kubernetes cluster secure. You can limit network connections, scan containers, container registries and Kubernetes nodes for vulnerable software, forbid running specific commands on certain or all containers. You can enable security for individual containers - when SUSE NeuVector has learned container specifics. That's why you can deploy SUSE NeuVector on production Kubernetes clusters where you are already running conteiners - it will not break anything.
Read full review
Tenable
[Tenable.sc (formerly SecurityCenter)] does very well for internal scanning for vulnerabilities, however it needs to be combined with Tenable.io in order to do cloud scanning.
Read full review
Pros
SUSE
  • Scans containers software for known vulnerabilities
  • Denies command execution in containers
  • Prevents unwanted network connections from/to containers
Read full review
Tenable
  • Vulnerability management from one place
  • Maximum endpoint visibility
  • Easy to set up and plan the structure
  • Support desk quickly responses
  • Well-prepared documentation
  • Broad scanning type
  • Supports various compliance standards
  • User groups allows coordination between teams
Read full review
Cons
SUSE
  • I like everything about NeuVector. They are on the right development path.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Centralized vulnerability management with sensors.
  • Network health assessment and Incident response.
  • For alerting or notification, it should also support the SMS gateway.
Read full review
Usability
SUSE
No answers on this topic
Tenable
based on product capabilities and usage
Read full review
Support Rating
SUSE
No answers on this topic
Tenable
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SUSE
SUSE NeuVector is deployed on your Kubernetes, and data does not leave your data center. Sysdig is a cloud platform - you have no full control over what happens with your data. Also, SUSE NeuVector has a capability to prevent specific command execution ir containers, but Sysdig does not have such ability. Sysdig is not an open-source solution, but SUSE NeuVector is.
Read full review
Tenable
We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud with theirs. Tenable io product as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SUSE
  • We went from being blind to what happens in the Kubernetes network to seeing everything and being able to control Kubernetes network communications.
  • Now we are able to detect vulnerable containers faster.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies
  • Improve compliance & risk management
  • Cost management
  • Solid vulnerability scanner
  • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
Read full review
ScreenShots