TestGrid vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Easy navigation. Test Data Management. Flexible Supports for Automation Testing Sometimes it fails to connect to cloud devices or browsers

• As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes.
• It is easy to understand by business people

Incentivized

• Low barrier to entry for beginner test engineer due to scriptless nature of test case
• Proficient test engineer could utilize CI/CD Integration
• Both Browser & Mobile Device Infrastructure Available Natively

• Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources.
• It is fast to automate SAP projects
• Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify.

Incentivized

• Can be slow in instances where multiple scripts and requests are running on a webpage plus the docs can also be improved

• Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly
• Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data

Incentivized

We frequently came across scenarios which were too cumbersome for manual testing & wanted an easy automation solution. We are now using TestGrid for those scenarios & are happy with the product.

SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest.

Incentivized

• we were looking for a remote infrastructure provider so that our remote team could use it for automation as well as manual testing.

• Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development
• Licenses issues should be minimized

Incentivized