Testiny vs. TestRail

Testiny

TestRail

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Testiny	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Testiny is a test management platform that offers features to make the testing process more efficient. It is used to manage test cases, create test plans and runs, generate rich reports, analyze results in real time, and the platform features integrations with DevOps tools.	$17 per month per user
TestRail	Score 8.3 out of 10	N/A	TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.	$35 per month billed annually

Pricing

Testiny

TestRail

Editions & Modules

Advanced: $14.50
per month (billed yearly) per user
Advanced: $17
per month per user
Testiny Server: Custom Pricing
per year per user
Free: -
Limited to 3 users
Enterprise: Custom Pricing
per year per user

Professional Cloud: $35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud: $38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud: $71
per month billed annually per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Testiny	TestRail
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Gradual discounts starting at 10 users. See the pricing calculator on the Testiny website.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Testiny	TestRail

Features

Testiny

TestRail

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Testiny - Ratings	TestRail 7.5 3 Ratings 7% below category average
Centralized test management	00 Ratings	7.53 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	00 Ratings	7.02 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	00 Ratings	7.53 Ratings
Test execution reporting	00 Ratings	8.23 Ratings
Defect management	00 Ratings	7.02 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Testiny	TestRail
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.5 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Testiny	TestRail
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.3 (3 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Testiny	TestRail
Likelihood to Recommend	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools. Incentivized Binoy Shah Software Integration Tester Read full review
Pros	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. Managing test plans and test cases Generation of test results Modularised way of storing tests Incentivized Alfiya Mukadam Software Engineer Read full review
Cons	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. Outstanding user bugs UI is clunky Things are not where you think they would be Incentivized LK Lisa Krol Quality Assurance Engineer Read full review
Usability	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved Incentivized Alfiya Mukadam Software Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd. Incentivized Binoy Shah Software Integration Tester Read full review
Return on Investment	Mategra GmbH No answers on this topic	Idera, Inc. We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail Incentivized LK Lisa Krol Quality Assurance Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots	Testiny Screenshots