Likelihood to Recommend Very stable and cost-effective. Better integration with leading database vendors would be great; this would address features that are missing like x-windows support and concurrent secure file transfers. Patching is relatively fast and not as frequent as other vendors (with no impact on adherence to security best practices). Very easy to install and low storage footprint. Read full review Pros Most up to date secure/encryption technology. Very fast to set up and maintain. Supported by all major hardware platforms (Microsoft, Linux). Read full review Cons X-windows support could be more robust. Virtual shell adaptation could be improved. Greater concurrency for large secure transmissions would be a great add-on. Read full review Support Rating Support organization is active, so is online community boards. There have been no significant issues that haven't been able to be quickly addressed by either online documentation or F-Secure support. Easy to use diagnostic tools and information gathering, make problem analysis fast. Phone support can be different due to time zone differences, but this has not been a major issue. Read full review Alternatives Considered This suite of software does not have any mentionable competition, in my opinion. It adheres to current security protocols, in-frequent patching requirements, low IT overhead, and on-going support are exemplary. Robust documentation and online community boards help keep support and maintenance transparent and efficient. Legacy support for older OS' is quite useful. Simplicity when onboarding into custom hybrid network configurations is also vital. Read full review Return on Investment Very low cost. Low IT overhead (very low network bandwidth, CPU, storage utilization). Supported by all major hardware vendors. Read full review ScreenShots