Digital spaces, made accesible.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
At its core, the product is great. When we make websites for clients, we make them with the eye of able-bodied people. This leads to disruptions when so many users with problems have accessibility issues. That’s when the audio eye comes in. It is a great software to reconise the flaws so that online can be made a safe space that's accessible to all kinds of people.
Pros
- It’s automated. So it finds the flaws automatically, and what's more is that it fixes them too without needing human intervention. Saves time that way.
- Websites keep getting updated, so there have been times we miss out on smaller details. AudioEye continuously keeps check, so whenever something is wrong, it is fixed for accessibility.
- There’s always a looming threat of legal action. We never want to disappoint users with accessibility issues but in case something slips through, we are provided with legal backing.
Cons
- AI in general can always improve. That’s a time-based thing, and I'm sure over time the AI will get smarter and smarter at recognising issues.
- Personalization can be more varied. Thankfully, it is offered at the moment, but it can be expanded upon.
Likelihood to Recommend
It is near impossible to find all accessibility flaws on your own when designing a website. Having an AI keeping track brings firstly, peace of mind, but also more customers and engagement. It makes sure no customers lose interest because they can’t maneouver in the space properly. So this helps when you’ve come on the web, but want to make sure you have legal and accessibility compliance.
