Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 9 out of 10

Score

9 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Ease of Deployment and Configuration: Users have consistently praised the Cisco ASA for its seamless deployment and user-friendly configuration process. They find it straightforward to set up, allowing for a quick integration into their network security infrastructure.

Centralized Management and Convenience: The web-based interface for centralized management is lauded by reviewers for its ease of use and time-saving convenience. It simplifies tasks such as license setup and software maintenance renewals, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

Performance-Driven Security Features: Customers appreciate the robust security capabilities of the Cisco ASA, which not only provide adaptable protection but also include an advanced analytics engine to effectively identify and mitigate potential security threats.

Reviews

88 Reviews

Great and easy way to manage robust Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software devices.

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

May 23, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software for connecting to our office network when not in office premises. Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software has great CLI and GUI software options for managing, configuring the device. We normally use CLI to change or create configuration. We are very satisfied with the ease of software in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Firewall.

Pros

Both GUI and CLI options for accessing firewall
easy to use.

Cons

There should be an option to convert configuration from older Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software models to newer ones.

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software software offers ease in configuration of device through both GUI and CLI interface.

Verified User

Director in Corporate (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

13 years of experience

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Review

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

March 31, 2024

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In my Datacenter as a border firewall

Pros

Easy do deploy
Easy do configure
Realible

Cons

Object Managment
Grafic Interface
ACL with URL allowing Masking

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software is ideal for VPN connections

Verified User

Consultant in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

16 years of experience

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Review

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

March 24, 2024

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software is used to create and enforce security policies to control the traffic entering and exiting the organization's network. We also use its VPN functionalities, allowing remote users or branch offices to securely connect to the organization's network.

Pros

Centralized Management
Intrusion Prevention System
VPN Concentrator

Cons

Cloud Integration
Reporting
User Interface and Management

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software is well suited for large enterprise environments where robust firewalling capabilities are required to protect complex networks. Its VPN capabilities enable organizations to securely transmit sensitive data over public networks, ensuring confidentiality and integrity of communication between sites. Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software may be less appropriate for small office/home office (SOHO) environments due to its relatively high cost, complexity, and resource requirements as well as unsuited for organizations with cloud architecture.

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

Cisco ASA Firewall Review

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

August 27, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

So we have shared usage of it and for us we really just implement rules and it to block allowed, deny whatever it is, traffic within our network.

Pros

We typically just use it to block traffic. It does what it is supposed to.
We just use it to monitor, block, allow. Blocks at the layer three.

Cons

Management, I would say a single pane of management that works would be good. Similar to the FTD, the FMC, being able to manage objects and security group objects in one pane. That would be good for the firewall versus having to manually create objects and monitor them across several different firewalls across several different contexts.

Likelihood to Recommend

Well, it's very suited for up to layer three maybe but it's not suited for layer seven or anything above layer three. So it's not that next-gen smart.

Verified User

Employee in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

5 years of experience

Adaptable yet Powerful Firewall Solution

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

June 20, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have several Cisco ASA and FTD firewalls in use within our organization. The ASA name is the legacy platform for the now current FTD firewalls. Both platforms provide security access for both internal networks to communicate and for external to internal network accesses. Cisco does a great job providing firewalls that are easy to manage and configure (by a skilled network administrator). The central management system; FirePower is pretty straight forward to deploy changes needed to any firewall across our network.

Pros

centralized management via a web based interface
easy , one time license setup
easy yearly software maintenance renewal process and easy access to tech support when renewed
adaptable and performance driven to protect networks
excellent analytics engine to detect malware and security events and block them

Cons

rather expensive to get into for many models
working with cisco acct management is not easy and getting into a streamlined renewal process can be problematic
some software upgrade require other security changes which mean its a continual upgrading process to stay current. and can be cumbersome

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco ASA's are great for internal network connected access between a firewall and the central management server. And, for complex networks where high security requirements with overly strict compliance are necessary. For networks with limited connectivity to the core or for poor network connectivity these are not the best solution. There are other more stand-alone firewall's that do this better. These firewall's are a little more complex to set up to start with so significant knowledge of these devices is required to set them up and ensure they are best practice installed.

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience

Choosing Cisco ASA and ASAv for reliable, scalable, and secure VPN

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

May 1, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our employee count was growing and we wanted to have a scalable, easy to administer and cost effective solution for a VPN concentrator. We wanted to support concurrent connections that was 2x our employee count. We chose Cisco's ASA as our VPN concentrator and that allowed us to scale with low administrative cost and a reasonable license/tooling cost. We also wanted to support 4 different entities, which ASA was able to help us achieve.

Pros

ASA is our VPN concentrator. The client and server are very stable and very easy to use
ASA also offers Intrusion Prevention, to an extent. This is also very useful for an improved security posture for a small company
ASA allowed us to scale very quickly. We could onboard clients, partners, and consultants and give them a great onboarding experience as well
Administrative costs with ASA are low. It's very easy to administer.

Cons

For small companies that require DLP, ASA could add a basic DLP system
ASA has an easy web administration screen. It's look-and-feel could be improved
ASA could develop and/or promote agentless VPN access

Likelihood to Recommend

We moved our operations entirely to the cloud a few years ago. We loved the stability and scalability of the ASA and wanted to, somehow, keep using it. We discovered that ASA was available in the cloud as well and it was branded ASAv. We tested it and noticed that it was equally robust and a perfect fit for us. During the entire migration period, we used ASAv for cloud operations and put a lot of load on it. ASAv performed very well and gave us an easy transition from on-prem to the cloud.

Verified User

C-Level Executive in Corporate (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

Cisco ASA Review.

Rating: 4 out of 10

Incentivized

June 22, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have used ASA to interconnect branch offices and also as a gateway. It's been a good product over the past years. Nowadays a lot of firewalls have overtaken the product. Especially in terms of user-friendliness. Also, the performance of the product should be improved compared to the other firewalls out there in the market.

Pros

Vpn
Natting
Av scan.
Web filtering.

Cons

Definitely when troubleshooting. It should be made simpler.
AV scan engines should be improved.
Configuration can be made simpler.eg: Fortigate.

Likelihood to Recommend

It's well suited for the rigid environment. In remote site locations where there is difficulty in accessing it's not a good idea as it's difficult for an end-user to provide remote access to the device. I understand it could be a security issue. But there are other means it can be secured. 2FA should be integrated.

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (501-1000 employees)

Vetted Review

7 years of experience

CiscoASA Firepower

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

December 9, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our business uses ASA'a as firewalls and for routing. We route 2 incoming connections and route them to allow our customers to come in on one dedicated SLA provisioned fiber line and a general internet line for internet browsing. We also utilize the failover capability of the ASAs for redundancy. We will utilize the security features when we have completed an upgrade project.

Pros

Routing
Firewall
Security

Cons

Ease of use
Cisco's purchase model is difficult
Level of skill required

Likelihood to Recommend

These appliances are great for small or medium business that needs a higher level of security will additional functions able to be purchased. It is a great reliable device for routing and firewall use, I've monitored user activity and utilization of our internet connection bandwidth noted outside attacks, DOS type when we see slowdowns, found infected computers by seeing them communicate with outside systems. A lot of helpful resources in the ASA

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

8 years of experience

ASA is a good product, migrating to Firepower

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

December 2, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have been using Cisco ASA as a part of our company for many years. It is used for routing, [dating], site-to-site VPN, remote access to our internal network for our employees when they are not in the office.

Pros

Allows the users to connect to our office network from outside the office.
Straightforward interface for configuration of firewall rules.

Cons

Support is a little expensive
The GUI could use an update
NextGen features

Likelihood to Recommend

If your organization is a small business and you don't require advanced-level security then you can go with the Cisco ASA firewall. However, when you want to use a full L7 with NG capabilities, you should go with firepower.

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

8 years of experience

Cisco ASA the best firewall for any scenario

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

November 26, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Cisco ASAs in our Datacentre and we deploy these firewalls for our clients, with users mainly working from home, AnyConnect VPN which works with this firewall helps a lot by facilitating a secure remote access connection back to the office. Also, users can [break out] to the internet using [a] secure [VPN] connection when accessing services like O365[.]

Pros

Easy deployment[.]
High availability by deploying a pair[.]
Make changes without having to reboot[.]
Supports firepower services for IPS and IDS[.]

Cons

The ASDM software is at times a nightmare to install because of different java versions[.]
[The firewall] could do with a power button, just to be able to do a hard reboot when needed[.]
It would be nice to manage the firewall via the web on port 443[.]

Likelihood to Recommend

The Cisco ASA is well suited for data centers, enterprise, and small offices. The fact that there are several models big, medium and small makes it easy to deploy certain models for small offices and bigger models for datacenters. I personally believe this firewall is great for many scenarios, l have deployed a pair to manage internet line failovers and single entry-level ones for small offices with ingle internet lines.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

Reseller

7 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Home
,
Firewall
,
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
,
Reviews and Ratings

Adaptable yet Powerful Firewall Solution

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

June 20, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

centralized management via a web based interface
easy , one time license setup
easy yearly software maintenance renewal process and easy access to tech support when renewed
adaptable and performance driven to protect networks
excellent analytics engine to detect malware and security events and block them

Cons

rather expensive to get into for many models
working with cisco acct management is not easy and getting into a streamlined renewal process can be problematic
some software upgrade require other security changes which mean its a continual upgrading process to stay current. and can be cumbersome

Likelihood to Recommend

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience